Search results

Your school may not run it in Year 11 and 12, however, that doesn't mean you can't take the course. You can take Japanese Continuers via New South Wales School of Languages if you really want.

i agree but idk if it's rly them worrying rather than them just being curious as to how it works

... i'm talking about HSC marks, not scaled marks a HSC mark of 93 in 4u maths has a similar scaled mark to a HSC mark of 97 in english advanced a HSC mark of 93 in 4u maths requires likely a raw mark in the 70's or 80's whereas that 97 in english advanced prob needs very close to 97 raw to get...

stop talking about break-even point it's the most bullshit, badly interpreted metric the website he uses is the talent 100 atar calculator tho his "break-even point" is prob fairly accurate as his own metric but it's utter bullshit you need an 85 in pdh to not be affected by scaling? that's...

So relatable hahahahaha Whatever you do, DO NOT listen to what Rubix Learning says about it.

ik old post but: 1. looks like just AM/GM, strict inequality cuz not equal 2. doesn't look true without some context 3. induction type shit

I've seen people using freevpn (unicorn vpn) but idk I cbb using one

nah there's a few non-sci ppls (not talking about myself i'm doing 🤓 subjects)

you should approach it the same way you kinda approach auxilliary angle questions f(x) = 5sinx+12cosx = sqrt(5^2+12^2)sin(x-a) = 13sin(x-a) from there, it's pre clear that |f(x)| ≤ 13

yeah but depends what you’re doin in that 1 hour If you spend that hour efficiently, yeah you can do well

I made the file ;) idfk who uploaded it tho

https://www.studocu.com/en-au/document/doonside-high-school/economics-hl/leaked-cssa-2024-mathematics-advanced-trial/99400869

no way is that sethio the math goat

at least 2 u wildin gl

they are wrong bruv (break even point aint even a real thing unless she's defining it in a way convenient to her argument) the table shows HSC marks, not raw marks when you receive HSC marks, those are aligned to performance bands and hsc marks via blah blah blah and linear interpolation unless...

BREAK EVEN POINT ISNT REAL (at least the rubix guy interpretation of it is cooked) if you’re looking at the UAC report, you may have realised that basically every single subject bar 3u and 4u maths technically scales down no matter what mark you get (unless 99th percentile maybe) chem scales...

motivation gonna fail yo ass (i'm lucky that I haven't been killed by my lack of discipline given my small workload) discipline >>>> ngl it's easier to get a better scaled mark in higher scaling subjects like 40-50 raw in 4u is way better than a b6 in business studies (i think)

nah what maybe they could but on track idk bro why'd you spend that little time wtf if you're getting those kinda marks with minimal time allocated, ur doing well bruh also which years were those papers?

I reckon if you start grinding trial papers you should be fine also what ruse year was that cuz idk how you could get 85% in both ruse and baulko 85% in a ruse trial is defo good

bro take chem phys jk jk do whatever u want but chem is fun ngl