Search results

BRO ARE U… me? And am I u? Wooottttttt

Also, WHAT DID THE SUPERVISORS SAY? I HOPE U DON’T GET MARKED DOWN

I agree but I’m not sure if I “cooked” my arguments to an E4 level. I’m hoping I did for both. Did 10 pages for Q1 and 8 for Q2 but, couldn’t finish my last sentence for the former ;(

Aight everyone, thoughts on the exam?

IT’S THE LAST STRETCH. So looking forward to Saturday where I sleep in with no academic stress🥹. I’m already dreaming about my post-HSC life

YOU BET! HELL IF I CAN USE JFK, HECK YEAH

GOOD LUCK FOR TOMORROW! I'm doing some last minute readings :-)

ten thousand thanks!!!!

It honestly depends what the question calls for. If it is around methodology, I would do the former (historians etc.) but as well as private and public history and of course, uses and abuses (real life e.g.)

HAHAHAHAHAH LESSGOO. It was a banging argument. Different too ;)

AS A MATHS EXTENSION 1 STUDENT, how hot? Please use the formula dt/DT = -k(T-32) and find values A and k Ae^kt. Please also factor the climate conditions

YES I SECOND THAT. I think we would honestly study the whole syllabus if it was possible lol

Completely agree with you. I love how they got rid of the UN and League of Nations section because to be frank, a little weird (though hate the new name because in my opinion, power and authority is sexier than democracy and dictatorships). minimal changes in National Studies broadly though...

Yeah to be honest, those options are hella weird. Whitlam and Menzies are pretty well, meh. I think Catherine the Great is a better option. Have u checked out the new modern syllabus. If so, would love to hear your thoughts :-)

Ahahahahah. I got jeered by the entire auditorium lol. It was for the writing essays one with Mrs Belinda Ho

Highly underrated topic for History Extension in my view because there are a multitude of personalities and geopolitical factors that needed to be considered.

Ah yes. Was it the one at Sydney uni earlier this year? If so, we may have bumped into each other unknowingly. I was the guy in one of the first lectures to argue that "neither KFC or McDonalds chips were good because of the economic conditions..."

I WANTED TO DO APPEASEMENT TOOO.

She is a goated teacher. I have her for legal and extension history. My goodness to sat I absolutely love her is a complete understatement

Respectfully, JFK is the chad!