Search results

99.85

hundreds of questions for a mid band 6 sounds fair lol..

no rofl what makes you think that rote learning is what people do if they want a band 5 deep understanding is actually what you need to get anywhere near a low-mid band 6, to do that you need to have done hundreds of questions

Note that they actually mark much more harshily for Chemistry in the exam room than in probably any school in NSW so where you may think you did something right, you probably didn't hence resulting in lower mark than expected

Matrix says 99.9 Einstein says 99.85 Talent says 99.8 Hopefully matrix is most accurate :wink:

killed ancient history :wink:

I hope that Fort Street can go up! :lol:

good job everyone !!

lol wtf m8 u probably just failed your externals legit - should be grateful for your rank 1 instead

Fort Street killed Economics this year! wooo

Expected high 98s Atar calc says 99.85

Yay

i can relate in many ways

How many marks was the 1W comparing red and blue light q worth was it worth 2 or 3 marks

80 raw B6 don't underestimate marking criteria

88 was state rank ffsing marking criteria you never come out happy because of that shit

This is what I have right now - not necessarily in any order Marks / Question 4 Ethanol 4 Ozone 6 Ostwald 6 Titration 7 Galvanic 5 Polystyrene + Biopolymer 4 Water testing at lab 4 Tuesday, Thursday that thing 4 Arrhenius 5 Natural indicator I'm still missing 6 marks worth of q...

answers for calc: around 9.9g ish for the galvanic cell 0.13M ish for the concentration in the same q 0.35M ish citric acid dilute or not dilute im not sure

yeh last year state rank was like 88/100 dat marking criteria

ok thats good, hopefully u can get 95/100 and drag the rest of us up had enough all my exam marks will be lower than school i have this feeeling