Search results

probs 97+ is state rank

yes i agree with u the question shud be scrapped they also failed to establish whether it was a "reasonable" suspicion

defo harder but i made better decisions looking at 19/20 (as opposed to the 17/20 in the trials)

if they suspect on reasonable grounds that they have a right to search or arrest someone in the car (Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, s.36A).

i did a

praying 2 god for about the same they mark shit easy (from what ive seen) so fingers crossed

sorry could u provide the entire question and the answers? (from memory) im still unsure as to what it is :S was it to do with the first step in the trial process?

what mc q are we talking about?

ahk pretty sure its just robbery though u only are charged with conspiracy if you were stopped short of committing the act

i agree with ur second statement dont they have to arrest b4 questioning otherwise u arent authorised to answer

im confused, whats your answer? just robbery? (thats what i did)

no the robbery question what would they be charged with? robbery or conspiracy + robbery?

agree they arent testing our knowledge on content they are testing our ability to make informed guesses (which is absolute shit because there is always a level of uncertainty) mc shudnt be a section at all

yes 19 is c first step in the process gotta arrest brah, gotta arrest

ahk we will agree to disagree WHATS THE ANSWER TO THE ROBBERY QUESTION! :@

obviously

agree with all and i sold my verity to everyone calling shane a her (i thought i misread shannon for shane) lawl what was the robbery answer?

hmm but he didnt rob directly he drove the car idk ur probably right its definitely not white collar (which is what i put) :'( what is the robbery question? whats the answer? i did robbery (d)

im sorry but this is wrong she assisted after the principal offence and not before it whether she had knowledge of it beforehand is another story as her knowledge of it did not assist in the act directly

sweet