Search results

I dont doubt the big bang, you just seem to horribly misunderstand Big bang. Where are your sources, i think you're just making this up as you go tbh. Asking what was before the Big Bang is like asking what is north of the north pole.

You seem to think Testimony is adequate proof.

Which again links back to Russell's teapot. You have not refuted my points about the 1st causation argument. Your just restating your original argument.

No, this plain wrong, re-read what you learned about Big bang.

Again you show complete Ignorance of Russels teapot. And again, your being naive with testimony. (btw testimony would be considered evidence, not good evidence for obvious reasons.)

Yes, because that worked out so well before.

I never made that claim though. You're pretty naive if you think God explains everything science cannot.

You are a Fucking idiot. I also refer you to the 1st page of this thread, look for why religious texts cannot be used to prove god.

You make the assumption that I've never been to church. I still do on occasion, mostly for family reasons/tradition.

Not verified by anyone, in fact, your pretty naive if you don't think its possible miracles are fakes/exaggerations/rumors/etc Maybe if you actually understood Russel's teapot you would know why your 1st 3 lines have already been refuted. and Again faith=blind/willful ignorance.

God does not explain anything other than Godddiit. But I'll ignore the hypocrisy in the rest of my rebuttal. Sorry argumentum ad numerum and appeal to the authority of the bible does does not make Russels teapot argument weak. Please if you have many sources of evidence please share them, for...

Yeh does damn unborn fetuses/ people who have never heard of Christianity should all burn in hell. Sorry but your god is an egotistical idiot if he believes that everyone needs to be forgiven for something Adam and Eve did.

Umm yes it is, he is saying Gibbo is picking and choosing. The bolded bit is the causation argument. Must i really go through why this argument is lame? Faith= Blind/willful ignorance, more often than not the former. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russels_teapot

So instead we just jump to the conclusion that there is a God...amrite? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russels_teapot Its retarded to just assume there is a God

No, he judges you by the points you put forward. There are intelligent Christians, you are not one of them.

Way to go at ignoring him pointing out the flaw in your logic.

Umm, yes you have... unless you think we are deliberately making a straw man argument. Well in that case i still think our rebuttals are valid. A relational God is not proof of a relational God.

The FSM is a deity. A relational Deity. I know this, i have a relationship with him. I have experienced him. Frustrating ain't it

Do you mind telling us why our rebuttals are not valid rather than simply "you do not understand 2nd Im not asking for your thoughts on religion, I'm asking you if you believe that there is a Deity. If so in this case i believe our rebuttals are valid. If you are simply arguing the point that...

... whoosh