Search results

Re: 回复: Re: Scalling in PHYSICS vs CHEMISTRY vs ECONOMICS really, but when i saw it from the past hsc papers, the 2 extended responses were actually pretty straight forward and you wont be expected to write anything that u havnt learnt in class. and i do think u can actually prepare it...

Re: 回复: Re: Scalling in PHYSICS vs CHEMISTRY vs ECONOMICS is that because the physics paper in last year was easier than previous years? so ppl did better in physics than chemistry?

Re: 回复: Re: Scalling in PHYSICS vs CHEMISTRY vs ECONOMICS wow thanks a lot for ur information! so does that mean if i didnt do good in all three subjects, i should still choose physics rather than econ? Physics 2007 9,126 97.8 84.0 64.1 43.8 28.5 16.7 8.1

lol different people have different opinions?

http://www.talent-100.com.au/Scaling.pdf did anyone read this before? wht does the "percentile and position" mean in the table? still feeling confused x_x

how about between phy and econ? or chem and econ?

Does anyone know how large the difference between their scaling? with a specific example mayb? thanks a lot

really. i thought PHY>CHEM>ECON

ye i know but atm i just want to maximise my uai

sigh..ye.. what u said is quite true.. thanks for ur advice does anyone have their opinions can share?

but if u prepare for it, it can help ur multiple choice and short questions part as well so what are they?

Will you actually prepare quite a few topic of extended response before go into exam? erm because, the extended responses play quite an important role in the whole exam. it worth 40marks in ur hsc. if u do good in the essays part, ur whole exam will be >=fine. if u do not that good in that, ur...

Hi this is my first post here, and i really need some advice on dropping subjects. Im currently doing 12units- which are 4umath, esl, economics, physics and chemistry. My school ranking is within the range 50-70 in the state, I only aim UAI 92-93 and then to get 4marks bonus points to study...