Search results

Why bother, you'll never have to write an essay on WW1. Just stick to practicing source based questions

Read about the historians you study in class and organise any summaries you make about them so they follow the key questions from the syllabus (YOU NEED TO KNOW THE SYLLABUS) • Who are the historians? • What are the aims and purposes of history? • How has history been constructed and recorded...

Its never that high, even if it was a relatively easy exam

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historiography_of_the_French_Revolution This page outlines a lot of historians and what they say about the French Revolution. I ceebs reading it all so i'll leave that with you. Look at 4 or 5 different historians preferably from different schools of thought and see...

This is from the Cambridge textbook "Dietrich v The Queen (1992), which for the first time established a limited right to legal representation in Australia"

yep :)

Yep

Don't sweat it. It's only one part of the exam

Its B. Read the answer in full, yes its says statutory but the response is in regards to legislation

I don't think it will ever be that high. Probably somewhere between 82-85

Pretty sure its D because it can be given by family member and not necessarily the victim

"A" doesn't define legal representation though. You don't have the right to it, you can apply for it but it's not guaranteed that Legal Aid will represent you

Yeah but the UDHR is soft law and not enforceable. I don't see how it could be any of the others because otherwise Dietrich v The Queen wouldn't have any significance

It would be much simpler if you just read through the post. I was under the impression that if the offence is indictable like murder it had to be heard before a jury. When Cleverusername replied telling me it was lowered to manslaughter i was just clarifying that i thought manslaughter was also...

I was referring to Q20

I'm not 100% sure but i was under the impression manslaughter is still an indictable offence

For one i would assume her "limited ability to understand events" would significantly lower the sentence. Also Murder is an indictable offence and therefore would have to be heard before a jury. Murder can only be heard in the Supreme Court, so its C. And 18 is is definitely C. For starters...

.

If you wrote about it that's fine because it is part of the investigation process

Police discretion has nothing to do with the sentencing and punishment process. They are two different parts of the syllabus and don't actually overlap at all