Search results

yeah. was horrible test.

for electron one i used f=qvbsin0. and subed in a value for B. wont get al marks but wil get part marks. didnt even think of doing a projectile equation. edit jus realised i had to find v in the parallel plates. would of had to use projectile equation. fuck

number 1 is c. if u forgot the speed changes caus of the slingshot affect, the gravity and rotational motion of the earth propels the object changing its speed, or decreasing its speed.

cut off for band 4?

cut off for band 4 and 5?

no way would 55=band 2, 72/120 =83% in 2003, and 2009 was much harder. 55+/120 should = band 4. 65+/120 shuld = band 5 this year

you didnt have to say they were different bro, kinda obvious in ur description considering one is machines, one is free weights

ohhh thats not to bad. i was thinking i would lose way more. thanks man.

how many marks maximum do u think id lose?

what if you said the first stage is associative, and outlined cognitive, 2nd stage is cognitive, and outlined the associative stage wuld u lose marks for naming them wrong?

ok i got 19/20 then

llmao bro 20 is d. bahahaha

broo 20 is d mate.

wasn't too bad, hopefuly wil get band 5.

b was empowering individuals and reorientting health services right?

Re: band 3 or 4 cut off that makes me feel a bit better knowing i still have a chance of geting band 4 lol.

i still believe its consumer. jewlerry is not a niche market. 15-20 year olds are consumers. the amount of 15-20 yr olds in aus is not exactly "small and specialised"

a 56 raw mark in 2003 got sumone a 79 hsc mark.

oh ok thanks bro. 72 for band 5. quite acheivable. i jus need those 10 bonus points for U.W.S