Search results

Your questions are too vague dude - perhaps elaborate on what exactly you need to know about said degrees. Otherwise, just google up and find out wha they're like yourself.

why is that though (fullsrs)

snakeeeee

bullfuckin shit m8

dat essay response tho...

What kind of skills though?

Is this what you did for your trial? Potentially, but I don't know, because I found that there is lots of detail required in the form of evidence to back up your claims, thereby lending itself to more rote learning. I found that modern history is the most content heavy for the humanities, and...

guise just a quick Q for content heavy subs like legal, modern history and economics, I realised that my content knowledge for all of said subjects is non-existent. and I get that many recommend doing practice essays to improve argumentative flair, but I don't know if that is possible...

ftfy

lol

i don't think you can just simply copy and paste belonging ideas to discovery :haha: wouldn't that result in a really loooong essay? and if so, what sort of key words do we consider?

I struggle a lot with discovery, namely because it's a new AoS and it's no longer belonging. As a result, there are limited resources on discovery so I don't know how to construct a generic essay based off the rubric? What sort of broad ideas could I use to adapt? It would be nice if others...

you can also use connecting words such as: - as such (my personal fav) - indeed - by doing so - in this way - for this reason - subsequently - consequently - as a result - ultimately otherwise, excellent post :D

well fuk ur teacher's expectation there will be h8erz but you dun listen 2 those h8erz

worst thread 2k15

what kind of BS rule is that

Oh, sorry I should've clarified earlier (poor phrasing on my behalf). What I meant was that it's definitely possible to do well in subjects through smart and consistent study as a result of hard work, but irrespective, natural ability shouldn't be disregarded. Obviously if one doesn't study...

Well, what's your view then? I don't know, I think RoT said hard work (in memorising) via rote learnable subjects gives certain individuals a chance of doing well, but in my opinion, that logic is flawed because you can work just as hard in understanding (plus, it's less time consuming). Like...

Idk, maybe it gives those a chance to do well in the hsc if they're not naturally good at subjects which necessitate intellect?

i hope you're not serious...