Search results

LOL calm down. I'm not going to university for girls lmfao, just to get degree and study. They're of 2nd priority.

That was very informative, thanks alot man.

So really its just an matter of which uni has been running for longer, and the course atar cut-off they have. yeah dw its cool, i can understand why people say it, alot of kids in my grade agree with that statement anyway. So if you get a distinction in unsw or a distinction in uws and then...

I go to a selective school (Girra) and since the start of year 12 everyone has been talking about which uni they would want to get it. One of the most common unis that are talked about the most between my peers is UNSW and USYD, and the thought of UWS being a shithole gets thrown around alot. My...

Math just read the chapters for books like cambride, math in focus, etc, in year 11 youll cover differentiation, coordinate geometry, perms and combs, 3-D trig, idk it depends on whether you're doing 2u math or 3u math, 3u assumes you know most of your 2u stuff if not all, correct me if i'm...

Yeah, 4-unit will be the biggest obstacle in the year, and I'll have to prove to the deputy I won't drop it. But i did really well in the first assessment task, Idk if they're going to count it as a fluke cause i'm not top in math but i'm still fairly up there.

I don't mean to sound cocky, and this is purely from past experience but I don't think my ranks will change much, perhaps for math but not so much for chem and phys, I've been extremely diligent from year 11 onwards and have been getting consistent results, I always study the module before it is...

I go to girraween high, ranking in the top 15s or 10s for sciences, top 30 for math and average for english. At the moment i'm on 11 units and am doing 4u math 3u Eng chem phys Basically, I want to drop 3u english and go down to 10 units, i know the sound of 10 units is extremely dangerous...

Einstein's principle of relativity and special theory of relativity explained the results of the MM experiment. If light travels at the same speed in all frames of reference, then regardless the MM experiment will receive a null result everytime so it can never measure Earth's velocity relative...

ty ty. Also isn't repeating the experiment make it reliable? Validity is whether or not the method actually tests the aim, and that variables were controlled? To my knowledge, back in the days in which the MM experiment was performed it was considered valid and reliable as well, however nowadays...

Yep, what squar3root said, its to measure the velocity of the Earth relative to the aether. I've seen alot of people say its to test the existence of the aether, and that also is wrong. If they assumed the aether model to be correct, the results they were predicting was that there should have...

I thought ut = 0? Its like those scenarios where a plane drops a bomb, the bomb has 0 u(y) but has a value for u(x), similarly in your question the ball hits the wall, its vertical velocity is only influenced by gravity? o.o

I got a different answer to the first guy? I got 4.98s for the first time of flight, then plus the 10s = 14.98s 92.5km/hr = 24.44m/s s = ut + 1/2(t^2) 0 = 24.44t - 4.9t^2 t(24.44 - 4.9t) = 0 t = 24.44/4.9 = 4.98 Or you can do it with v = u + at 0 = 24.44 - 9.8t t = 24.44/9.8 = 2.49s since...

Ok, i have the basic idea now anyway, thanks heaps haha. (Y)

Yeah this clarifies heaps, thanks. So just basically, it serves as an easy reference point, and its standard room temp and pressure since its the most common environment which experiments are held in. By changing the conditions you also change your resultant EMF, and since the data sheet...

Just a quick question, why are the standard conditions what they are, why is it 1M, 25*, 100kPa, etc. Also how does changing the standard conditions affect the experimental EMF? Thanks