Search results

there is but i really dont see the point in explaining it to you.

i dont know about wind, but solar energy is actually reliable, we get plenty of sun. kudoes to Kolefax

thats what im saying. the question is worded wrong, im saying that the question being addressed here isnt "is rape actually as heinous as its made out to be?" what we're actually discussing is "why is rape seen as more heinous than other crimes such as torture?"

but then its not so much is rape as heinous as its made out to be, as it is why isnt torture seen as just as heinous. my argument was towards those who do not think that rape is as heinous, not towards those who think that torture is just as.

i understand that rape crimes are overly covered by the media, but why not advocate for harsher torture penalties, rather than lesser rape penalties?

im not advocating coal fired energy either. im just against nuclear power, and i dont see that as a reason to insult me.

rape is torture. and it is heinous. the psycholigical and physical effects will stay with them for the rest of their lives. but the only people who could comment on the effect that rape has on the victims is the victims themselves.

wikipedia may have citations, but that doesnt mean its particularly reliable. its too easy to bs on it. and im still sticking by my opiion. they were actually thinking of putting the power plant near where i live, and thats something im completely against.

prisoners lose their right to freedom as soon as they commit the crime, and lose their freedom as soon as they are imprisoned. they should have no choice. if they were given the choice of euthanasia, then they may as well be given the choice of their sentence. if theyve been sent to jail, then...

youre using wikipedia as a source?? one of the most unreliable websites in the history of the internet. this information is regarding the past, whereas here, we are dealing with the future. we cannot begin to imagine what could happen, and what may be the long term effects of this on our...

this is very true but i think dazza is doing both in a way. he is questioning the science and finding it lacking, so has chosen to ignore it, leading to his flawed conclusion

but have they yet found a safe and sustainable way to dispose of the waste and excess?? there is always the risk of a meltdown, contamination of soil and waterways, health risks for those working with it... why bother?? there are more enviro-friendly methods for energy, that are more sustainable...

there is no doubt in my mind that climate change is occurring, or that its a natural process. i am a bit of an eco freak, but although we are speeding up the process, what is there that we can do to stop it? what we should be investing our time in is minimising our impact and finding ways to...

arent we?? because thats what i was always taught in church. and i doubt its their mission, there are many gays who still wish to remain catholic, but cannot practice their faith because of how their faith treats them. The Lord created them this way, so why should they not be accepted?

isnt it? please, explain to me what i havent quite understood about my own religion.

he loled. and i know you suck. although doing the work would help. speaking of work, dont you have some trials you should be studying for?

a problem with jews?? and anybody who does not know who lady gaga is would be a very very fortunate person

its ok. im not persecuting catholics, just disagreeing with some of their beliefs. im the catholic who doesnt believe what the church would rather she did. i understand that its not just catholic beliefs, but other religions and cultures as well, but fortunately, australia is not a religious...

well, maybe not i guess, when its still safe for the mother. and definaately not after 5 months =]

when it starts thinking for itself, then it can be classified as lliving.