Search results

hey i was confused with that 7 marker(not 8) question on communication isn't it talking about auditory canal+organ of corti ..how they all work to detect vibrations and soundetc then just naming the technologies (hearing aid and ccochlea implant) i also wrote sonic shadow and eustchian? tube...

hey a question for the 8 marker last question in short answers what did people talk about in genes affecting phenotype i wrote 2 hetozygous parents can lead to a different phenotype using a punnett square am i right?>

u drew 2 diagram,,?? I had one digrams with boxes and arrows in between where i labelled receptors and effectors

isn't the answer C? oxygen-> haemoglobin carbon diovide-> blood plasma how can carbondioxide bind to haemoglobin?? I"VE NEVER SEEN SUCH THING ON ANY TEXT BOOK if i get this wrong ill scream!!!!!!!!!!!!!

for that question i talked about repolorisation and depolorisation am i right??

exam was quite good except for the communication part with question on not generation action potentia stimuli shit isn't q 11 A?? Because when plants are exposed to the sunlight they open up their stomata size to transpire more water??

isn;t q10 A? and q 13 D???

for question 1 i wrote colonnaded poles and atriumis dis right?

ii wrote like 5 pages for all of themu people are crazy

lol..i have to laugh at the fuller bread part..it was a laundry place not a bread shop hahaha..so funny

i understood the quote differentelyweren't they saying that archaeology has had nagative impacts to the sites due to the incorrect methods of archeologistsand they're referring tourists as clients because tourists are showing the same negative impacts to the sites??oh god if i'm wrong ill kill...

Pearson and Bandleri only had time for 2

ur essay seems so much similar to mine..especialy the techniquesi talked about the techniques because i didn;t understand the questionso i just slipped in how the use of language techniques develop the personality (random) of the characters at the end

6,6,6,= 18I wanted to spare the remaining 10 minutes to look over my work

loved the module B questionmy speeches fitted in perfect..but i only wrote 6 pages TT The pearson and bandler was the perfect speech for this question..haha

hey i still don't understand the questionwhat did the question actaully mean??i talked about funeral scene and the conflcting perspectives on the character and value of lepidusam i right? and what was with the diverse..?? was it diverse on opinions..??

oh i'm shit scared our year is gunna get scaled down because we're like the dumbest year in almost 7 years or so few people actually cried after the exam..it wasn't THAT hard i just wanted to punch them in their ass...they were ranked higher than me!! JESUS

Section 1 Question 5 (last question) I MISSED THE FUCKEN COMPARE PART oh well and i just analysed my two texts i did however mention they do show belonging through the notion of togetherness in homes but i didn't link them..i wrote them seperately will they give me a 0? i wrote a page

QUESTION: In your related text do you have to link it back to simple gift or can you just talk about the related text and just do a conclusion that state the links..?

i was referring to paper 1...on simple gift isn't every text comparative..?? aren't we stating the similarities between the set text and the related? im confused for example do i talk about my set texts for a couple of pages and when i'm doing my related text do i need to refer to my set...