Search results

to be honest, that isnt that bad, its still legible. =]

ok here is my interesting handwriting LOL!: http://i906.photobucket.com/albums/ac269/jjjjuussttiinn/IMG.jpg you will need to increase the screen to read it in full size (ctrl +) :) due to my shit scanner :D

haha anna, ill post mine tonight @ 6:30. i do believe mine is bad. ill let you be the judge.. :D

but markers will find MOST wont have neat writings in a hsc exam anyways. and if someones response isnt very good, but have neat writing, they still wont do good.

wow anna! lol interesting writing. but i still managed to read it..just at a slower pace and looking closer to the screen haha. you'll find people have far worse writing than that.

i'd have to disagree. having nice handwriting does not get you any more marks, and this can be seen through alot of the band 6 and exemplar responses that BOS releases, where most of them have really bad handwriting.

+1 yay thats what i did :) they would never expect the whole answer on the sources, they would want you to show other knowledge. :)

a common misconception in ancient history is the need to fill your essay with sources every 5 lines. lol however, markers actually dislike constant name dropping and sources that dont really show something of signifiance, which is why the criteria says "relevant sources" not "extensive" use of...

yeah i enjoyed Sparta as well, and its usually my strongest as well as Pompeii.

economy: iron bars, perioeci/helots, trade, kleroi/land ownership, and weaponery and pottery. umm the 12 marker i agree, it was good however, the source was so not helpful? i just kept trying to fit it into my answer, so i dont lose a mark. but yeah you only have to refer to it once or twice...

umm im pretty sure your wrong. the question was open to move into other industries. its always like that for the 8 marker. they do not limit you to the source.

exactly what i said ! hahah its the simplest thing in the source . :) which then allowed me to use my own knowledge for other areas of our landscape such as no religion, catholics, buddhist etc

hmm question 10. i dont think its C because the question says what BEST explains. interfaith hasnt increased in all areas of society just cause of one council. but rather, secularism has caused many to come together to show the importance of faith, and spirtuality in society.

pretty sure, it said using the source and your own knowledge, account for the religious landscape/adherence in Australia. not specifically just the source.

yeah i put D for question 6 aswell.

If you quoted the source, or referred to the source youll get one for that. and youll probably get another mark or maybe two cause u mentioned denominatla switching. but,you needed to extend the answer to like catholicism, orthodox, jewish, islam, buddhism, no religion etc.

hey, say we did 2 related materials and 3 of the poems of our prescribed text. but we still did the 3 poems and 1 related in great detail as i only had a small paragraph on my 2nd related material in comparison to the vast detail i put in the others, can we still achieve a 13-15?

well i think it goes step 1: agreement which is done. step 2: consideration which is done. and then you also have the intention to be legally bound and be able to. i dont entirely get what your trying to ask. lol more specific perhaps? what about the case?

umm, that song some of the lines are copied from blink 182. get screwed. blink 182 owns you.

Just wondering is the use of child soldiers (internationally) and the mandatory detention of children / restriction of freedom of assembly (in aus) an eligible issue?