Search results

Standard and Advanced have the same ALIGNING. Their SCALING is very different as we see above. I would choose Advanced. I loved the Advanced course.

lol. during reading time, i was like, wait a second, did they make a spelling mistake and was that supposed to be "omnibus" but yeah, i realised that it was omens. someone else made that mistake in my class. as for me, the sacred wall proclaims rah rah rah =p damn cunctor. =p i was like with...

So how did you guys find it? How were the poems? How does it feel to have Latin over and done with? I felt that the exam was pretty good, i really liked the unseen except for one word which I never got around to learning but I knew I had to. Oh well, 2000 latin words down the drain =p Now I...

Textual Dynamics replaced Postmodernism. Fun Fun Fun.

I did 3 pages each for the Virgil-7 / Cicero-8 marker. 2.5 pages for the Cicero 6 marker. And my writing's pretty small so I'm happy with that. I kept on referencing the question. Hehehe. Also, Redfield, I just have to say this, you're a freak =p Great results!

I dunno. I put down it as dependent on verb because well, it didn't seem like any of the others for me. I think I'll ask my latin teacher for her opinion on the matter. With quaererent, I thought that it was concessive, how I translated it anyway =D Grammar was pretty easy I think, not any real...

So, how did you guys find the exam? No more pirate captains! No more shields!

Didn't they say to only use 1? O.o

Hopefully I made it go well with not belonging. The guy had one relationship and the other person betrayed him so he realised that he didn't belong rah rah rah. Relationships are important to belonging so if you don't have them, yay for individuality. I used the 1st one. Got to the very end...

Actually he's a pretty good teacher. Best teacher. No, I think he was trying to be nice to the people who did 2 texts. Even he was surprised that they put ONE related text. Most of the state would be tripped up by it. But there's minimal chance of you getting 15/15 I think. You have to lose...

Question was really bad for Dickinson as well. I mean seriously, a more simpler or broader question that would help for all the texts would be better. Meanwhile, tenuous references to "understanding." Here's hoping for 15/15 nonetheless. =D

I was talking to my English teacher and he said, yes you would lose like 1 mark for using two related texts because you didn't meet the requirements of the question. Argrgrghhhhhhh.... ONE related text was evil!!! Thanks Board of Studies so much. Not only give us belonging but screw up with our...

lol. totally agree. omg. that announcer was annoying. totally lost my train of thought. just like shut up, if we wanna risk 5 years without sitting umat, then we'll do it. i'm scared. its such a long wait until the results. section 3 > section 1 = section 2 had some time to check...

Hey Latin 09'ers! Just seeing that we needed a thread. How are you guys all coping with Virgil and Cicero? Cicero and Horace? =D

oh i do sympathise. I have 3U Maths and Latin Continuers!! What is with that?! Very very annoying.