Search results

Blit, have you done these http://community.boredofstudies.org/10/maths/368264/2017-maths-maths-ext-1-maths-ext-2-trials-dropbox.html that is pretty much the extent to which you'll find online

no, please pay attention to the answer given. (I used (u,v) as opposed to v1 and v2) The transformation turns a line from gradient y=3x into a line v=-9/2 u. More generally a line y=ax+b, into a line v=-1.5a*u +b The inverse maps requires the inverse of the transformation matrix.

Substitute z and w into the equation given and take real and complex parts (1) \cos{\alpha}+\cos{\theta}+1=0 (2) \sin{\alpha}+\sin{\theta}=0 Solutions to (2) are \theta = -\alpha and (-\pi+\alpha) The latter does not solve (1), as upon substitution gives 1=0, as...

can confirm that thsconline only has HSC papers. at the moment I am redesigning that part anyways, so Engineering Studies are offline entirely. best bet is to ask your teachers, usually schools purchase commercial papers. have a look also at the VCE syllabus, you may be able to milk past VCE...

Re: HSC 2018 MX2 Marathon https://thsconline.github.io/s/?view=5348&id=0ByEFYhkkDQBKSHRZUFRPZU9FM1U&n=Sydney%20Boys%202002%20w.%20sol

yeah I think so

haha no.

nah I more believe that if something is a good thing and works for the benefit of our society why change it. if that means a particular legal concept/definition should be retained, it should be retained.

Again the 1984 sex discrimination act clearly stipulates that it is the marriage act as it is not discriminatory, in the sense of the word that you are using. that is the whole issue, those who disagree with the changes, do not view the current definition of marriage ad discriminatory because it...

addressed earlier. it is a matter of principle/definition. it comes down to what marriage is. it is a question on why marriage over just giving them civil rights in a defacto relationship/some other name relationship. https://www.facebook.com/VoteNoAustralia/videos/902321679922044/ there has...

firstly, this is purely research and not pragmatic/practice yet, and for good reason, there are massive ethical questions about allowing that, even just the stem cell research which the question is why historically speaking, the focus has primarily been on male-female relations for procreation...

if it is as you say an arbitrary legal definition, then why is it so important to emphasise the fact that it discriminates supposedly on sexual preference, if it is not about sex? Marriage has always be linked with sex and procreation, it is one of the reasons the institution exists...

The video posted earlier in the thread presents why this objection is tenuous; marriage in principle, is linked with the raising of children and the obligations of that: https://www.facebook.com/VoteNoAustralia/videos/902321679922044/...

sure if race was explicit in the definition of marriage, which it isn't for good reasons.

1. same-sex couples cannot naturally procreate; in principle. 2. men and women are biologically/genetically and psychologically difference so these 3 are different: - men & women sexual union - men & men sexual union - women & women sexual union. i think those two reasons, are enough for a...

If I haven't addressed it check the longer reply... A different way of approaching your same study: basically if the observed data exists, which you presuppose it does, then you cannot accept the conclusion (C2), that Jesus did not break the laws of nature. Only if you assume that the laws...

Might be good if I summarise what I said, because addressing individual comments is going nowhere. I may not address particular points/arguments, but the gist of your questions/objections and things generally raised. This might make it a little better to handle.

False representation: to be able to do science, you are under the the assumption that the universe is ordered. No one disputes. I am simply making the claim that when we approach science we come with assumptions. The AIG site which was alluded to, several posts, is one classic example that...

Always assuming an argument. I was simply describing what Jesus taught and how he would have answered why some in this world suffer in poverty. there is much more that Jesus taught on the subject, but I thought to start with that. Yeah probably because I haven't done anything serious against...