Search results

Hmmm many ways to answer this I'm guessing? The strengthening of protectionist policies, such as the increase in general tariff levels, may see a rise in the international competitiveness of firms in the very short term as they are able to compete to a larger extent with imported foods. As such...

Bump :p

Did the same. Would we loose a mark for doing decimal value instead of exact? The question didn't specify exact value from what I remember.

Inefficient industries see a decline IC. As such, they may shut down also leading to higher levels of unemployment (particularly structural). Also what Shazor 2 said.

Pretty sure substitution method integration is wrong in Qn 11. The answer should be ~0.14 not pi/12 from memory.

96/97

Isn't e3 35/50? "Finally, for each band the total raw cut-off mark is mapped to the reported cut-off mark: For non-Extension courses the bands: 6, 5, 4, 3, and 2 have reported cut-off marks of 90, 80, 70, 60 and 50, respectively For Extension courses the bands: E4, E3, and E2 have reported...

qn 2 is b isnt it?

I think its fair to agree it was just as hard or harder (more likely) than both 2009 and 2010. As such band 6 cut off should be ~76-77? Right?

Looking at low 70's raw -_- Would that get me 86+

Wtf. Deadset is 1 % of the state supposed to get the 4 marks. What were the BOS thinking.

lol. CSSA trial combined parametrics with rates of change so who knows.

band 6 if you got 80+ for sure imo

integrate velocity from 5 to 0 and add that answer to the absolute value integral of velocity from 5 to 7.

I got 29

Or B :p ?

This paper was FUCKED lol.

84-85 imo

yep haha thats what I did in the test. just wrote it wrong now. I edited my previous post to fix it up.

Whats the answer then? Bounds are 0 and 4. x^2=y+4+4(root)y