Search results

Wasn't the question like the impact of DNA replication on Evolution. So i naturally thought that it was mutation... can someone clarify. My teacher answered this in a really weird way. I don't think you had to mention gamete formation because I thought if they wanted you to, they would have...

So putting humans is alright... right? Who else put humans?? By the way what did you guys think they wanted for the fish and insect thing? I described the structures and gave an example of a stimulus and described its pathway to the CNS and then how a response is generated... Did I get that right?

What did you guys put down for the horse disease 4 marker.

Umm so am I wrong?

I was just explaining DNA replication and why it happens in the body... I think that probably wasn't needed. But was there anything missing??

I wrote about the eyes of humans and fruit flies.

I thought that ^ would get me the marks. What do you guys think is necessary that I didn't write.

This was my answer for the evolution thing: DNA replication occurs in cells and is important in the mitosis which enables organisms to grow and repair. However, mutations, which is the change of the DNA sequence, can arise during replication. This change may give rise to a new phenotype which...

I didn't have that. I only had the mutation thing and I gave an example... Will I loose marks?

Was it bad that he removed people. I thought that same number of people in each group was good.

I thought that taking people out wasn't a problem... the control group and the smoking group have to be the same don't they?

Yay!! But for the compare question that followed, I said forthe differences that the cornea and the aqueous humor weren't present so that kinda made the experiment a little different...

TheOptimist did you put any advantages for the epidemiology study?

Guys... did you get this: For the question about the experiment thing: "Match THREE pieces of apparatus used in this experiment with THREE identified parts of the eye." I did lens: I, K and J = lens of the eye Solution = vitreous humor Fine paper = retina I am being told that I am wrong...

I wrote it in the form of advantages:; disadvantages:... For advantages I said that it had a control, variables were kept constant, any pre-existing diseases that could affect the results were checked For disadvantage I said that the sample size was too small, he didn't really conduct the...

Yeah... I think a lot of people would have done very well in the MC bit. But I think this year they will make the marking criteria really harsh...

For the question about the experiment thing: "Match THREE pieces of apparatus used in this experiment with THREE identified parts of the eye." I did lens: I, K and J = lens of the eye Solution = vitreous humor Fine paper = retina

I thought that the question said explain why it is recessive instead of being sex-linked. I said that it was impossible for it to be sex-linked as if it was the father must have the allele for it to pass it on to the woman, however if he did he would show the disease. Because he doesn't show it...

Did you have to say that. I only mentioned the second bit about the dad not having the disease.

How did people draw the graph question. I had like 4 1cm grids left over on the horizontal axis.