Search results

Omd someone asks a genuine question abt a visa and study and yall always take it as an opportunity to crap on the Middle East

Good luck guys!!! Ur gonna smash it

U GOT THIS YALL HEAD UP

u can def try to do some light revision, walk around and speak your notes out loud to help you retain the info. The less stressed you are, the more you’re likely to soak in info!!

don't memorise an essay! try to memorise key concepts under each crime topic. in ur exam, spending just 3 mins making a mind map of which topics u want to talk about and what cases/lcmid u wanna include can change everything, no point including a lot of info without organisation. i grouped my...

which topic r u focusing on where there's no law reform?

similar format with defining but it depends if the q asks abt ctp or cjs or whatever. if it was ctp id say something like: **1st sentence = to what extent statement/answer question directly. due to its increased focus on judicial discretion and the rights of the alleged offender rather than on...

Be as cohesive as possible with your argument! Say things that distinguish u from the rest. Eg: u say something is somewhat effective, u need to also say “had (whatever topic or court or agency) implemented this specific strategy (name what is it, like whatever consumer marketing strategy etc...

anything is possible tbh, but still worth going over bc u can always use that info in a HR 7 marker

yes one hundred percent! also mentioning police powers here would be great

all good bby u got this!

if the question is on youth offenders? id steer away from using the same case but u could try to put the argument of age + children's court in one para

generally theyd specify if they want international, if they say just courts then assume domestic, which includes youth koori + drug court : )

yep that's okay too! ppl have gotten 15/15 with 2 paras, u got thisss

ur gonna walk in there with a fat headache, half asleep, nauseous asf.

for the crime essay, before going in i aimed for 3-4 paragraphs, stick with a minimum of 3! these paragraphs are just 3 topics. u can use a lot of evidence within these paragraphs but if u have too many topics and concepts then the reader finds it hard to follow what ur talking abt, u lose sight...

honestly they've been predicting credit for like the past 5 yrs but nothing, still worth going over. also im not sure if uve already been told but plsss define as much as u can. literally define what a consumer is, whats a business, what is credit, whats debt, these marks are easy marks!! this...

nooo its okay u still have a couple of hrs, ur gonna regret pulling an all nighter

just looked at my paper: i also talked about CTP with charge negotiations --> not only encourages cooperation bw offender and court but also reduces amt of resources spent on court procedures by reducing likelihood of prolonging the case, example is R v. Taiseni. but counter argument is that...