Search results

my analysis on dickinson and my other perscribed text was really good....i hope it wont matter

haha are you going to schoolies on the gold coast?

can i still get13/14....the whole bit on the film comprised like 1/7th of my essay

will it matter as much?

it was only one of my additional texts?

pleassssssssssssse!

or...is it all good as long as your provide some textual justification for your thesis

help help help

mid 80s

i analyised a film for my essay but only examined the language techniques within the film, not visual techniques.....am i fucked?

yer i did society and nature as well...found dicksinson incredibly difficult to use

6,6, 7 i have tiny writing though

i did the same two as you and got around 2 and a hald pages :/

time management is the biggest thing i struggle with

i said the composers use of varying colours represents the complex, multi-faceted nature of belonging. I said this was reinforced by the juxtaposition between colour and images, representing that belonging can be both idealistic and tangible. :/

yer, dickinson was very hard to adapt..i thought the question was hard for some perscribed text and really easier for others. anger

Re: How Great Was That? haha i actually did that as well. pretty much substitued place for society and/or nature

i did 2, 3, 2 booklets respectively... some people in my year did 5 booklets...should i just say, fuck that, the markers will recognise that they're not being concise?

Re: How Great Was That? i thought emily dickinson was hard to use for the extended response :/

holy fuck.