Search results

Yeah shut up lolsmith

http://dsc.discovery.com/tv-shows/curiosity/topics/ten-nasa-inventions.htm

Teflon

I like how you totally ignore the fact that the story is patently untrue, but never let the facts get in the way of another racist rant by solo

Low-cus

Lol. I would move if Howard came back. Gillard is a fine representative, there is honestly nothing wrong with her. Rudd was far worse as PM

And if the parliament was hung after a second election? Should we have gone to poll after poll after poll until we got a majority. Do you think David Cameron is unelected because he also failed to achieve a majority in the house of commons? The people also failed to endorse him. The people...

Putting aside a fact for the moment that in the UK there is no preferrential system so all we can go on is primary votes in which the labour party was thoroughly demolished (36.1% vs 29%), whereas under the preferrential system we KNOW that 50.12% of people in the last election would prefer a...

There are plenty of things to argue against gillard about, being "unelected" is not one of them, you are smart enough to know that and it is beneath you to do so.

Don't know about rules, but afaik there's no laws against it. Semi relevant: even after 8 years when I run into an old teacher they are still 'sir' or 'miss' to me.

Are you seriously saying they should have kept the policy? Also p sure she won the last election an that since federation PM 's have been elected by the party not the people

And it happens here too, didn't Howard loose the 2PP vote in 98

I reckon it'll look alright but it might make you look a bit thuggish - not necessarily a bad thing

http://m.smh.com.au/nsw/meet-the-pride-of-st-johns--the-untouchables-20121105-28u8d.html Follow up. Freaking hell one had their own barrister, what a joke, entitled rich kids are the worst.

Stand directly in front of camera so it's a direct face on shot, pull hair back flat with one hand, take picture, then I can judge

Or it could just be the system of one vote, one value a principle that has served is well for 110 years

a) Bachelors degree =/= maturity. You're one of the most immature people I know and you're a phD candidate. B) by this logic the requirement should be those who pay tax, regardless of educational status

I think the trouble is actually that is disenfranchises people but w/e

Nope.

As others have said - sit the exam anyway but also apply for misadventure