well theres no point in rambing on through hardcore language if it doesnt make sense. I find sometimes that the best writers just say things simply, in short sentences..
i did a short-story piece for 4unit and found that unless youve got an idea which works, no matter how many twenty-nine...
generally they split the two questions into a social and political/military thing
i highly doubt weimar will be in it but my predictions are generally quite shoddy
i hate the stupid wording of legal studies questions...
they could make the questions much more simple if they were written in plain english... ARGGGHHHHH
haha lets start a combined creative piece here... everyone write like one sentence to follow on from the previous.. Ill begin from that above: "it was a dark and stormy night".....
"i could just make out a figure in the distance ahead"...
firstly yeh i think there is something wrong wif gay men, but neway thats off the topic.
same as dina, i reckon the only logical way to structure is to compare the values and context through the similar themes.
each to their own...
haha how else are we suppose to talk about the text then?? i use the themes to look at the context and values... its essential to do that otherwise your essay will just sound gay
i spoke to the advice line and they said to get a band 6 you actually do not have to include quotes... however it can boost your mark from a 17 to an 18/20 .... (something to think about when the whole things based on bands).
*Identify data sources, plan, choose equipment or resources for and perform a first hand investigation to demonstrate the Doppler effect.
Anyone got some ideas?