Search results

hmmm I know that if you looked at light.... you'd be able to see a changing changing electric and magnetic field ...... but I'm not sure wether you'd be able to see your own reflection or not! errrr BlackJack? SpiceGirl? a lil help here?!?!?

for safety reasons I reckon you should know what quarks make up protons and neutrons.... they're not that hard anyways up quark has a charge of +2/3 and a down quark has a charge of -1/3 therefore you just balance them in 3s to make a proton of charge +1(UUD) or a neutron of zero charge (UDD)...

Look as Galileo figured out..... In order to work out projectile motions you have to break them up into vertical and horizontal components vertical motions always have constant acceleration and horizontal motions always have constant velocity this is where you plug in the 3 equations...

Current Playlist: (some kinda old) Nelly & Kelly - Dilemma Toya - No Matta What Musiq - Half Crazy (remix) Another Level ft TQ - Summertime Ja Rule - Always on Time City High - Caramel Mary J Blige ft Ja Rule - Rainy Dayz B2K - Why I Love You Wycleff Jean ft Claudette Ortis - Two...

Civil Engineering at Sydney Uni......... why is this course so unpopular?

If they do ask something about it in the multiple choice.... I still have a 25% chance of getting it right which one would u sacrifice? 1 mark or perhaps studying something else which can be in the paper?

should be finnnnnnneeeeeeeee I hope.... as long as they don't ask me any battery questions or calculations with titrations

well the dot point in the syllabus says Solve problems........... using the 3 equations given, so I think if you haven't studied them.... go and do it!

I go to Aloys! It's just a small insignificant school by the Harbour........

Physics Contexts But yea I've got the answer now so it's sweet moving right along.... I'm now stuck with what the heck is a transistor.... and how are they different to a diode?:chainsaw:

Trust me you don't wanna study Quantas to Quarks.... it's so abstract and heaps of "current" stuff which needs like a high degree of mathematics to explain it properly eg: angular momentum Add to the fact that my teacher just skips dot points every now and then because he considers it to be...

STRESS LESS!!!! instead you can be rest assured that they won't ask a battery question this year cos they had a 6 or 8 marker on that one last year hence they won't use it this time round and for monitoring management all they really want you to do is being able to calculate using...

Aiiighhtt.... I have finally found an answer from somewhere.... and basically, Planck was just interested in pure science, he believed the application and consequences of research should be left to politicians and etc whereas Einstein took a moral stand and said that not all research is good...

errrrrrrr is that it? thats all I need to know? Planck was an idiot and Einstein was a goody goody two shoes?

Can someone help me with the Planck Vs Einstein debate in relation to scientific research and social and pollitical contexts? my teacher did not cover this dot point and my textbook only has a brief thingy on this! :confused:

Waverley wins the swimming every dingle year.... can someone say scholarships? Oahh and Aloys have to be the best school, there's only 118 guys in the form and 40 of us are prefects, we don't wear stupid hats to school like Knox or SHORE and. The prefects don't even have to do any duties...

Waverley wins the swimming every single year..... can someone say scholarships???? Aloys have to be the best school! we have 118 boys in the form and 40 of us are prefects.... hahaha and we don't do any duties whatsoever before/after school, recess or lunch. Prefects just walk around with...

Farkennn Shipwrecks and Salvages......... Electrolysis in aqueous conditions? Goddd how many factors do you wanna put in there? I wanna go killl someoneeeee notice how water is oxidised and reduced differently in alkanic and acid environment....... blah I hate this option :chainsaw...

Hmmm I have not seen/done the Ruse paper.... but from what I understand, Ozone is harmful to humans due to the reactivity of the co-ordinate covalent bond 0=0-0 .... this O radical breaks of from Ozone and attaches itself to our cells which interferes with the way it works .... eg: respiratory...

Personally I skipped 9 marks out of the entire paper and it's really buggin me! cos I knew how to do everything just ran out of freakin time in the end! so max marks I can get is 111/120 and add some silly mistakes..... that's bye bye Band 6 and combined with my chat English mark..... bye...