Search results

really? where do these stats come from?

no way is 1 mark from 10th to first near the outliers, the marks are more spread apart in the middle, 1 mark might mean a few ranks but not near the bottom/top

yeah i removed it it's full anyways

60-75 yeah

screw that, it might even go up you never know aim for more than enough xD

eh?

i don't like smokers

it's not immoral when you're right which is the only situation i ever scab for anyways

don't worry excessively about it just put in some good hard work, and you can increase uai by quite a sizable amount i _think_ i improved by about ~10 aggregates or so from my half yearly estimate to my trials estimate/hsc result 10 aggregates is pretty sizable

holy shit i kinda epic fail at scabbing marks, get 2/3 at most

yeah that looks pretty solid, mid 90s. just aim a bit more than 942 just in case?

yeah it is; if you grab a good 1on1 tutor you could probably finish it in a week

Re: 回复: Re: Scalling in PHYSICS vs CHEMISTRY vs ECONOMICS do not let scaling in the way of choosing your subjects you'll do a lot better at subjects you like, so any of the 3 would be fine

wow think of what they're missing out on!

you can, with proper application of work etcetc just do as well in maths as you did before, bump ranks here and there, etc

Re: 回复: Re: Scalling in PHYSICS vs CHEMISTRY vs ECONOMICS pretty similar overall do the one(s) you're best at, or all 3 xD

qft +1

lololololol funny post bro

aren't the two things you just said the same?

are they % or the mark the Board gives back?