• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Search results

  1. S

    who else is surprised with chem and phys?

    I got 91 for chem and was expecting 95ish tbqh, also 86 for phys when I was expecting around 93
  2. S

    General Thoughts: Chemistry

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't there probes that are able to detect nitrates/phosphates?
  3. S

    Multiple Choice

    Thanks 11 - misread :( 20 - Took it as PbCl instead of PbCl2. Ah well, only 2 mistakes (or 3 depending on Q 12)
  4. S

    Multiple Choice

    Aside from Q12, anyone want to explain to me why my answers are wrong? (Posted on the front page, seem to disagree with most answers on a few q's)
  5. S

    General Thoughts: Chemistry

    Your answer is correct. I made a mistake (got 0.04 moles instead of 0.004) :(
  6. S

    Multiple Choice

    Except that would mean you start counting from the chain closes to the Cl, meaning it would be 2-chloro-3fluorobutane
  7. S

    Multiple Choice

    They're not meant to :P. From my understanding, 2-chloro-3-fluorobutane should've been the answer, but it wasn't there.
  8. S

    General Thoughts: Chemistry

    Something around 25 I think
  9. S

    Multiple Choice

    I was fairly confident with my answers too (most is the same), looking through differences now
  10. S

    Multiple Choice

    My Answers: 1B 2D 3A 4C 5B 6C 7D 8D 9B 10B 11C 12B 13D 14A 15C 16A 17C 18C 19A 20B
  11. S

    Multiple Choice

    In unviersity level, yes. From HSC content - no (Electronegativity takes preference over alphabetical in university naming)
  12. S

    Section I - Multiple Choice

    10 wasn't the peak, ~8 was. If you use 8*10^-6 you get B.
  13. S

    That tower question

    If you mentioned that it would accelerate at an accelerating rate, probably. (The value of g increases as the object falls).
  14. S

    Section I - Multiple Choice

    I had 5C and 7B
  15. S

    That tower question

    The earth spins at a (fairly) constant rate, the further away an attached object is from earth, the faster it moves. Therefore, it has a velocity relative to earth, allowing it to enter orbit through centripetal force. That's my understanding anyway
  16. S

    Section I - Multiple Choice

    Re: General Thoughts: Physics This lol
  17. S

    That tower question

    The mass on the tower on the equator would have a higher velocity than earth's rotation, allowing it to stay up and orbit. The mass on the tower of the north pole has no velocity relative to earth though
  18. S

    That tower question

    Yeah, that's pretty much what I had, since it would be released at the same velocity of a geostationary satellite.
  19. S

    That tower question

    Did people put the object dropped from the tower at the equator will orbit the earth, and stay motionless relative to the tower? I've spoken to 30ish people about it, everyone had something different :(
  20. S

    Q12

    Re: probability question You'll should get them :)
Top