I'm not saying u guys are doing this but lotsa people throughout the year would come out of tests and say how good they did when they ended up getting like 70% or worse.
Maybe the majority of people using the forum are more intelligent than the average?? I hope so since these estimates are so...
that test was so hard. i think I got about 98% raw.
what the..............................??????????
I think I got about 70 so would that be really bad rank wise?
I think vegeta_316 will get marks too. At least I hope so because it seems almost exact to what i wrote.
The syllabus dot point says reliability, while my teacher said to treat it as validity, so I think it must not matter too much between them.
crap.
I thought since the aluminium is passive this would mean that the steel corrodes in preference. So the layer actually forms on the hooks? dammit!!!
I know its not 2 water molecules, I made a stupid mistake, some how!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How the hell do u guys remember all your answers, like the concentration??????????????
yeah
I break the limits every day with my undeniable intelligence and fast paced hand.
I am glad I am not one of less fortunate people who are kinda stupid, you know, the majority of the world, hey.
I wonder why nobody else is on here?
They must have thought it was so easy its not worth talking about-----------otherwise they are seriously dumb still being in there at this time of the day
thats cool mate.
I wish I was stoned so I wasn't so bored by the incontestable amiable nature of the Q. It took me about 40 minutes to finish hey. What a joke.
I got 100% for the MC and that stupid Q.5 on the pastures suited to arid climates was heaven sent---15 marks..............MY ASS!!!!!!!!
I reckon I got 100% I am sooo happy.
I wrote some of my answers on the sheet at the end, and I can't believe I actually wrote the derivative of sinx is sec<2 x----------if they know u have just accidently done something really stupid, do they give u the mark???? :)