Look, I don't believe people should take 4u maths simply for the scaling. But a below average 4u aligned mark of 80 is better for you than a 95 or 90 in pretty much every other subject.tempco said:80 is an OK mark. and if you aim for 80, you'll probably get lower - similar to how many people aim for 100 UAI, but end up with .6s or .7s, etc.
So have we decided what RAW exam score one requires for 80+ aligned?Slide Rule said:If you can get 80+ aligned I believe you should do 4u, because it'll help out not just your UAI but also your problem solving skills. And it provides a fresh challenge compared to the boring rote-learning that is the rest of the HSC.
We never will. Just do your best.Stefano said:So have we decided what RAW exam score one requires for 80+ aligned?
Please make space so I can send you a PM! lol... thanksBOS_Forum_Bot said:Slide Rule has exceeded their stored private messages quota and can not accept further messages until they clear some space.
So in your opinion I should not have done maths ext 2. How ironic.justchillin said:My opinion: if you don't get 97+ for the HSC course mark (ie ranked top 3 and raw mark >105) then you'd be better off with a lower level of maths.
I don't think it's necessary to get 97+ to make MX2 worthwhile. Personally, I've estimated that I'd be better off with an 88/100 in MX2 along with a 96/100 for MX1 than my 98/100 in 2U. If you incorporate the level of work required, I'd say an 85+/100 makes MX2 worthwhile. A student who merely sits in class and listens to the teacher can probably manage 85/100, keeping in mind that a significant part of MX2 is easier than what may be found in a MX1 or even a 2U paper.justchillin said:My opinion: if you don't get 97+ for the HSC course mark (ie ranked top 3 and raw mark >105) then you'd be better off with a lower level of maths. People always say how well Ex 2 contributes to your uai but that is only in the really top marks... when ur talking about 50/120... you'd be better off getting near 100 in 2 unit...
Maybe you're right. If you can get 99 or 100 in 10 other units.justchillin said:Hey I know the scaling is good aight but Ex 2 is worthless unless u get 97+.... [in my opinion]
You have no idea what you're talking about mate.justchillin said:My opinion: if you don't get 97+ for the HSC course mark (ie ranked top 3 and raw mark >105) then you'd be better off with a lower level of maths. People always say how well Ex 2 contributes to your uai but that is only in the really top marks... when ur talking about 50/120... you'd be better off getting near 100 in 2 unit...
Nevertheless, stating that an aligned mark of 97 is required to make MX2 worthwhile suggests that ~99% of MX2 students will gain little from the course which is, of course, incorrect.justchillin said:97 course mark not raw...
That's not true, 4U is worthwhile if you enjoy it and get something out of it. Besides, I'd say the top few students are actually not particularly advantaged compared to other subjects. Think about it this way: an aligned of 99 might get you a uac of 99.5 or so, but a 96 will also get pushed up fairly high, say >98. Because the marks are 'squashed,' it is really those with mid 90s marks who are most advantaged, as they only need say 100 raw to get their aligned mark.justchillin said:My opinion: if you don't get 97+ for the HSC course mark (ie ranked top 3 and raw mark >105) then you'd be better off with a lower level of maths. People always say how well Ex 2 contributes to your uai but that is only in the really top marks... when ur talking about 50/120... you'd be better off getting near 100 in 2 unit...