2024 HSC Chat (58 Viewers)

[hihglightermmmm]

ppl actually piss me off mfs cry over everything
no way guys they asked something that's a major part of the rubric for that fcking module who could've guessed

Hahaha and the question had more nuance than just to "ponder a world without the amenity of modern technology"

 

[K2Trappy]

Hahaha and the question had more nuance than just to "ponder a world without the amenity of modern technology"

swear like do u expect them to give u blank question and say write a discursive, creative or persuasive and pick a topic of ur liking?

 

[Solarised]

swear like do u expect them to give u blank question and say write a discursive, creative or persuasive and pick a topic of ur liking?

chill lad english is over now

 

[K2Trappy]

chill lad english is over know

the damage eng has done to me for 2 yrs is too significant to forget about in just 6 hrs

 

[Solarised]

the damage eng has done to me for 2 yrs is too significant to forget about in just 6 hrs

Yea but you ain't even complaining bout the subject, just on the unprepared people

 

[appleali]

View attachment 44852

dont think thats happening lol

 

[nitto]

what if instead of english it was freaklish

 

[bcv]

what if instead of english it was freaklish

what if instead of taking HSC exams we were all ordered to peg submissive femboys

 

[CrimsonStrider]

what if instead of taking HSC exams we were all ordered to peg submissive femboys

realest thing someone has posted here

 

[enchantedivory27]

very very late reply but how are you feeling about the investigating exam?? the only module i feel like i actually know super well is mod 7... otherwise i'm so cooked

mod 7 is meh for me and mod 8... our teacher finished that on the last day like wtf mrs cooper! anyway mod 6 and 5 are better, hoping its just a normal investigating exam

 

[Sir Jigger II]

How were both English Papers. I am hearing mixed opinions, i cbb bothered going back to read other messages though

 

[enchantedivory27]

How were both English Papers. I am hearing mixed opinions, i cbb bothered going back to read other messages though

chill i am worried for 2025

 

[enchantedivory27]

well not easy but no extracts, mod c was discursive or persuasive, obv most of us did discursive like nesa you're on something to do that for sure

 

[finwand]

How were both English Papers. I am hearing mixed opinions, i cbb bothered going back to read other messages though

Advanced-

Paper 1 was weird to me. It was a 3, 4, 5, 3, 5 marker split (like wtf) and I personally did poorly
Common module question was a 3 part and good for those who treated each quality/motivations/action as a different concept in relationship. Needed to have prepared thoroughly/a good understanding of your text to do well

Paper 2 was both good and bad. Depends on the person
Mod A was broad and a nice question for those prepared asking you how ur perception of the later text changed from reading the earlier one
Mod B was about 'artistry' and 'textual integrity' and you needed to address how ur text was that, and its 'literary value'. I didn't like the question but I think it was solid and niche enough that a key differentiator might be whether you knew their definitions, and shaped ur thesis in line to it
Mod C was a 20 mark discursive/persuasive. 2025 will for sure be a split

 

[flyawaykay]

cafs on friday this is not conducive to positive emotional wellbeing

omg someone else doing cafs, very random but for section 2, how long do your responses tend to be?

 

[hihglightermmmm]

what if instead of taking HSC exams we were all ordered to peg submissive femboys

Oath cunt

 

[TheLastHope]

Advanced-

Paper 1 was weird to me. It was a 3, 4, 5, 3, 5 marker split (like wtf) and I personally did poorly
Common module question was a 3 part and good for those who treated each quality/motivations/action as a different concept in relationship. Needed to have prepared thoroughly/a good understanding of your text to do well

Paper 2 was both good and bad. Depends on the person
Mod A was broad and a nice question for those prepared asking you how ur perception of the later text changed from reading the earlier one
Mod B was about 'artistry' and 'textual integrity' and you needed to address how ur text was that, and its 'literary value'. I didn't like the question but I think it was solid and niche enough that a key differentiator might be whether you knew their definitions, and shaped ur thesis in line to it
Mod C was a 20 mark discursive/persuasive. 2025 will for sure be a split

can I get over 15 if i didn't actually mention texual integrity, but i think i still answered most of it right

 

[finwand]

can I get over 15 if i didn't actually mention texual integrity

Did you mention anything about its definition? What was your thesis?

 

[enchantedivory27]

can I get over 15 if i didn't actually mention texual integrity, but i think i still answered most of it right

if you talked about the enduring value of the text over time then that implies it, but you could get a pedantic marker

 

[TheLastHope]

Did you mention anything about its definition? What was your thesis?

cant remember lowkey made it up. but i think it was decent