im pretty sure i got 75 too, i got munched by that exam...so annoyedwhat band/mark would that align to? thanks!
FUAARRKK, that's hectic...what mark u reckon 75 would align to...roughly?Band 5.
Band 6 is around 79-81
88-89 (closer to 89).FUAARRKK, that's hectic...what mark u reckon 75 would align to...roughly?
i thought this test was hard actually to be honest, the MC was alright...pretty sure i got 17...but went a bit downhill for me after hahayeah I think I got around 75 as well mc seemed so easy yet there was heaps of little tricks and stuff. so angry haha. I got 85 in cssa trials but felt that test was better!
wow, you reckon this test was harder than 2010 paper? i found 2010 challenging, but 2009 was easy88-89 (closer to 89).
worst feeling after exam when you walk out and i'm like "yea i spoke about this, this n that", and like 3 other people spoke about something different...shatteredI think 2010 was a LOT harder, especially the 7 marker. The 7 marker was extremely difficult last year - when you're under pressure. Communication last year was also harder. This year it was quite broad (although causes me difficulties for being concise!)
Yeah, the epidemiology very bias for the PE students. Although, we were expected to know it, so it isn't like it came out of nowhere.
ahaha, yea it was dendrite! you know for the X and Y technology i put X a thermometer...apparently it wasn't -_-same here. haha. I did communication but made mistakes here and there. I was tossing up between what was B - I though it was a dendrite and KNEW it wasn't a nerve. I wrote dendrite but the next question was 'what was the role of B' and I was like. the syllabus asks us to know the role of a nerve...so maybe its a nerve...even though i KNEW it wasn't a nerve. argh.
that's right!!ahaha, yea it was dendrite! you know for the X and Y technology i put X a thermometer...apparently it wasn't -_-
communication is hectic but, i look at all the other options and they look so tedious and boring
december 14 but, moment of truth hahaha
I based my prediction off 2009 results. This paper IMHO was significantly harder than 2010 paper. I did the 2010 paper and got ~91/100 raw with an hour to spare.wow, you reckon this test was harder than 2010 paper? i found 2010 challenging, but 2009 was easy
haha, i like the corner crying idea...what does IMO mean haha? i see it on this forum all the time and just go with itIMO, this paper was much harder than any other paper I've done (including trials from different schools, etc). I was hoping for a band 6, now it's impossible. Time to cry in my little corner now....
if it wasn't a thermometer what was it haha?ahaha, yea it was dendrite! you know for the X and Y technology i put X a thermometer...apparently it wasn't -_-
communication is hectic but, i look at all the other options and they look so tedious and boring
december 14 but, moment of truth hahaha
i dont know, but i was told it couldnt be a thermometer because a thermometer would measure ambient temperature as well...pretty bullshitif it wasn't a thermometer what was it haha?
Quite possibly mate - because it was a difficult test hopefully they drop the band levels - i can honestly see 72 being 5 five - ban6 79-80worst feeling after exam when you walk out and i'm like "yea i spoke about this, this n that", and like 3 other people spoke about something different...shattered
yea 2010 was hard, under pressure especially...i thought communication this year was alright but (u do communication?)
i just hope 75 does align to 88-89, id be so cheerin'