yeh, umm..janet i thinkbaker182 said:20% that kinda reflects on the lectuer Is it still the South African lady?
but now apparently we have bruce, an american dude, but i missed his first lecture so i'm not sure what he's like yet
yeh, umm..janet i thinkbaker182 said:20% that kinda reflects on the lectuer Is it still the South African lady?
Yeah, I am sick of all the repeated content in the different subjects!baker182 said:The topics are also in another ECON 3year subject, which I'am doing next year
Haha, that is so true and something that me and my mates have comented on before.baker182 said:Also accounting/finance subjects have more hot chicks than economics subjects
Bruce McFarling? He is an alright lecturer. I had him for one of my subjects last semester. He gets heaps into it. The bad thing about him is that he tries to made everything to simple that he just ends up confusing you, if that makes any sense, haha.em_516 said:but now apparently we have bruce, an american dude, but i missed his first lecture so i'm not sure what he's like yet
I think Brcue is shit I prefer James over BruceSoCal said:Bruce McFarling? He is an alright lecturer. I had him for one of my subjects last semester. He gets heaps into it. The bad thing about him is that he tries to made everything to simple that he just ends up confusing you, if that makes any sense, haha.
One person said that the average was 35% and another said it was less than that. I really doubt they have access to information like that though. Some people want it to be scaled, but I don't think that's going to happen.em_516 said:what were they saying?
Of course he is better than Janet. You would be hard pressed to find a lecturer worse than Janet.em_516 said:bruce isn't so bad..MUCH better than janet, that's for sure..i listened a lot more yesterday than i do normally so that could be a good thing..got my test result back today.. :S
That average mark is quite possible. As I said before, according to one of my mates who did the course in second semester last year, the average mark in one of the in-class tests was supposedly about 30%. They won't scale the mark, however, they may give you the option of it not counting if you do better in the final exam or something, at least that is what I recall him saying they were thinking of doing.Craig said:One person said that the average was 35% and another said it was less than that. I really doubt they have access to information like that though. Some people want it to be scaled, but I don't think that's going to happen.
Only got 19.5SoCal said:Haha, there must be a mistake. There is no way I could have got 25/30! I didn't study at all and I have only read the first three chapters of the book. That is the same mark I got for the ACFI2070 mid-semester quiz and I actually studied for that test. They must have marked this exam very easily. How did you go baker182?