• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Advanced Maths Predictions (1 Viewer)

P

PCNQQn2

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
63
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I looked at the 3 sets of solutions posted for discrepancies, and also looked at mine.
* Q15: I got 5/18 for 15a and 3/5 for 15b, which is different to two sets of solutions posted. I have verified both with 500,000 trials in a spreadsheet.
* Q28c I agree with John Drake's answer: 2ln2-3/2+pi/4
* Q32c should be $931.54 (also verified with a spreadsheet)
* For Q24, my answer is (emphasis on with reference to the context given).
  • there is a positive correlation (r>0), meaning that as the age of characters increases, so does the age of the actors
  • r=0.4564 means a moderate strength of the correlation. i.e. if the equation of the line of best fit was used for interpolation, it wouldn't be too reliable. For example, for a character of age 15, the equation suggests an actor age of 20. But the graph shows there is a lot of variation for 15 year old characters (14 to 27 years)
  • gradient of 1.85 means that on average, for every extra year of character age, actor age increases by 1.85 years
  • extrapolation would not be reliable given there is not data for <14 and >17 years for character age, and the study was for teenage characters only.
 
Last edited:
C

chilli 412

oo la la
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
250
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
PCNQQn2 said:
I looked at the 3 sets of solutions posted for discrepancies, and also looked at mine.
* Q15: I got 5/18 for 15a and 3/5 for 15b, which is different to two sets of solutions posted. I have verified 5/18 with 100,000 trials in a spreadsheet.
* Q28c I agree with John Drake's answer: 2ln2-3/2+pi/4
* Q32c should be $931.54 (also verified with a spreadsheet)
* For Q24, my answer is (emphasis on with reference to the context given).
  • there is a positive correlation (r>0), meaning that as the age of characters increases, so does the age of the actors
  • r=0.4564 means a moderate strength of the correlation. i.e. if the equation of the line of best fit was used for interpolation, it wouldn't be too reliable. For example, for a character of age 15, the equation suggests an actor age of 20. But the graph shows there is a lot of variation for 15 year old characters (14 to 27 years)
  • gradient of 1.85 means that on average, for every extra year of character age, actor age increases by 1.85 years
  • extrapolation would not be reliable given there is not data for <14 and >17 years for character age, and the study was for teenage characters only.
Click to expand...
:sleep:
 
P

PCNQQn2

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2008
Messages
63
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
temporarylol said:
Is it wrong to say that there is a positive skew in the data whereby there's a larger concentration of actors aged 14-15?
Click to expand...
I don't think there is a point to be made based on skew.
Considering characters, there are 18 of them aged 14-15, and 15 of them aged 17-18.
Considering actors, there are fewer at both ends (below 18 yrs, and above 26 yrs), and more in the middle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top