There's a theory going around that he was actually acting for Gillard in order to flush Rudd out before he gained the numbers.Surely Crean didn't act unilaterally though, who actually organized it. Did Crean fall on his sword to put the issue to bed?
I disagree, the instability is internal, much of it spurred on by the press.The best possible thing that could have happened today was if the motion of no confidence actually passed and a snap election was called.
Wouldn't surpise me tbh.There's a theory going around that he was actually acting for Gillard in order to flush Rudd out before he gained the numbers.
Im not complaining.*Media endlessly reports on spill*
Nek minet
*How DARE you take attention away from the apology!*
Any speculation from now on is a pure fiction of the media thoughA lot of pain for labor today for little or no gain other the seeing Simon Crean declare his hand and go to the backbench. It still won't end the leadership speculation.
Even if it is, it is going to be the focus up to the election. Today won't have improved labors poll figures; they're either going to remain similar to what they are or drop as a result of today.Any speculation from now on is a pure fiction of the media though
I didn't even know Marles was on the front bench to be honest.Richard Marles has resigned from the front bench
Reshuffle required with Crean gone also.
Just want to make it clear that Richard Marles was not a member of the frontbench. The frontbench consists of only ministers. Parliamentary secretaries sit on the second row.Richard Marles has resigned from the front bench
Reshuffle required with Crean gone also.