What were your marks for English and Extension English if you dont mind me asking?Skeeta said:study hard...
i got 86.70 and did pdhpe, senior science general maths and hospitality.. i did adv and ext 1 english though..
Yeah scaling is fucked, don't believe the hype.dazzi_dani said:i did
std eng 77
bus 89
gen maths 92
bio 86
legal 88
geo 81
UAI: 90.10
But you have to do well to get above 90?Shuter said:Yeah scaling is fucked, don't believe the hype.
I did hard subjects.
Advanced English - 77
Math X1 - 65
Math X2 - 53
Economics - 85
Biology - 88
Physics - 84
You'd think a 90 UAI right?
Oh no, 86.90 is the correct answer.
KeypadSDM said:But you have to do well to get above 90?
Maths E2 is great scaling (like getting 90 in 2 unit), if you beat 1/4 people (Like 60 HSC mark). But you didn't do that. Same with E1 Maths (But you've got to get like 80's to scale really well). English scales up at 87+ physics for like 88+. Bio has bad scaling and I'm not sure about ecos...
I agree with your 'don't believe the hype'... but no offence, with those kind of marks for 3 unit, did you really expect it to be worth 'doubling', as you put it? Everyone tells you not to gamble with the scaling system (well, at least that's what all my teachers and advisors and anyone else who thinks they know anything have told me). If I start almost failing ext 2 at any point in the next year I won't have much hesitation in dropping it, extraordinary scaling or not. You have to do reasonably well in a subject to capitalise on scaling.Shuter said:I'm aware but I was mainly keeping mX2 as a gamble, so I would double the weight of my MX1 mark and then either MX2 or Physics would not count. As it is physics turned out well (how the fuck I don't know, I thought it was my worst exam bar MX2 and I had a huge cold and didn't even finish/attempt the last 3 marks of the test, as well as not knowing some other parts).
The main problem I think were my assessment marks. MX1 I had exam 73, assessment 57, final 65. Another guy had exam 79, assessment 88, so he only got 3 higher than me in the exam yet got 31 points higher in asessments! My fault for beingd lazy I guess (and a shit class).
Anyhow the thing said "due to MX2 student does not take 2U, it is likely he would of acheived a band 5 in this subject". According to 2003 results all I needed to do was get 83 or over in 2U and it would have been worth more than my Ext1 or 2 marks. That's pretty screwed, I feel I put in alot more effort and learned "more" in 3 and 4 unit than I would of had to learn for 2Unit to get an 83.
But ahh well, I can work around my marks.... just people getting 90's with some bodgey subjects at my school are annoying me, and kissarses who got high asessment ranks but did worse in almost every subject of the HSC exam.