Squar3root
realest nigga
what am i reading lmao
Google it. Its not just al jazeera, the guy is a fundamentalist nutjob.Quoting Al Jazeera to prove that Iran's leader supports terrorism is a big mistake. It is known that Al Jazeera is a highly biased Qatari channel that is backed up by Sunni Muslim ideology, which is opposed to Iran's Shia Muslim system. Al Jazeera would do anything to contribute to the deterioration of Iran on a range of aspects. Again, we're getting deep into Iran's politics, which is a whole topic on its own.
No, the cause of it is muslim fragility. Cartoons don't cause islamic terrorism, muslims do. If cartoons caused murders, christians would be murdering people over cartoons etc on a daily basis.If I recall correctly, the order was cartoon was shown --> murder took place.
There was an action, to which we saw a reaction. (Not justifying murder in any way, I'm just looking at the cause of it).
Okay, you literally ARE justifying it for fucks sake. You're saying that the murders are a result of there being something wrong with the cartoon. It's no different to saying that rape is a response to the way somebody is dressed, otherwise, why do rapists go after women dressed a certain way? Logically, its reaction to an action.Logically, if there wasn't anything wrong with the cartoon, no one would've done/said anything about it.
Yes, which shows there's a fundamental difference between christians and muslimsAlso, I, as a Chrisitan, would be one of the first people to protest if I see an offensive drawing/cartoon of Jesus being displayed carelessly. But it would end there, I wouldn't kill anyone because of that, which is where you and I both agree.
So you think that everyone who approves of say, invading a middle eastern country is willing to be out on the front lines? So-called "moderate" muslims who aren't terrorists are literally more angry about the cartoons than they are the murders.Approval of terrorism implies you would be okay to be present in an environment where terrorism prevails. That alone indicates a terrorist mentality. So yes, approving terrorism does mean you would be willing to contribute to it because it's something you're okay with.
this is INCORRECT. I can factually say that Islam (or as you call it the Shariah law), does NOT encourage or preach violence in any way. The problem here is, even though these people seem muslim to you, they do not represent Islam as a whole, they are just idiotic people who have no good in themselves. Just because a number of people do terrorist acts, it does not mean the religion as a whole should be perceived in that way.A majority of muslim support shariah law, which involves the violent enforcement of Islamic beliefs. So this statement is objectively correct.
Oh? So shariah law is simply a collection of suggestions? A set of guidelines that people voluntarily follow, and receive no punishment for not following? It's not enforced with the threat of violence?this is INCORRECT. I can factually say that Islam (or as you call it the Shariah law), does NOT encourage or preach violence in any way.
The founder of Islam was literally a slave trading warlord, so it seems like they're behaving similarly to him.The problem here is, even though these people seem muslim to you, they do not represent Islam as a whole, they are just idiotic people who have no good in themselves. Just because a number of people do terrorist acts, it does not mean the religion as a whole should be perceived in that way.
First off, no pope has raped children or nuns, that's just a bold faced lie.For example, a number of priests/ popes have been accused for raping children and nuns, but that does not mean that everyone in that particular religion should be labelled as rapists.
Jesus dude, i thought this was a website for HSC discussiononsOh? So shariah law is simply a collection of suggestions? A set of guidelines that people voluntarily follow, and receive no punishment for not following? It's not enforced with the threat of violence?
The founder of Islam was literally a slave trading warlord, so it seems like they're behaving similarly to him.
And in any case, the response to these murders from muslims was not widespread condemnation of these murders, it was condemnation of france for publishing cartoons and for not being okay with muslim murderers. Muslims are literally more outraged over the cartoons than the murders. So the religion as a whole is not making itself look very good.
And the leader of Iran and former leader of Malaysia have both come out in support of these attacks, both of whom were elected by and have the support of tens of millions of muslims. And dozens of muslim countries have laws against so-called 'blasphemy' and will use violence against those who are 'guilty' of it.
So no, violent opposition to blasphemy is by no means a minority opinion among muslims.
First off, no pope has raped children or nuns, that's just a bold faced lie.
Second, the founder of Islam was literally a pedophile, the founder of Christianity was not. No catholics are okay with pedophillia, whereas marrying children is common and accepted in much of the muslim world. So that was a really, really bad example to use.
No, but what I have seen is the representative of christian churches (i.e the priest, pope) molesting the children and nuns. If you want to defend a cause or go against a cause, or bring your dim witted opinion into anything, I suggest you actually learn all aspects from both sides. You've been deceived by what the media shows you. Why can't you do some good, have a read of the entire bible, then have a read of the entire Qur'an, then make your decision. Please, don't make an argument based on what's on display, or the choices of people, this is how society becomes corrupt.How many christian terrorist attacks occur in the middle east in the face of legitimate religious persecution? None?
Even historically christians have been much, much less violent
I have read the Quran. The founder of Islam was a violent warlord who traded slaves and had sex with children.No, but what I have seen is the representative of christian churches (i.e the priest, pope) molesting the children and nuns. If you want to defend a cause or go against a cause, or bring your dim witted opinion into anything, I suggest you actually learn all aspects from both sides. You've been deceived by what the media shows you. Why can't you do some good, have a read of the entire bible, then have a read of the entire Qur'an, then make your decision. Please, don't make an argument based on what's on display, or the choices of people, this is how society becomes corrupt.
This is a sub forum of news current events and politicsJesus dude, i thought this was a website for HSC discussionons
Oh? So shariah law is simply a collection of suggestions? A set of guidelines that people voluntarily follow, and receive no punishment for not following? It's not enforced with the threat of violence?
The founder of Islam was literally a slave trading warlord, so it seems like they're behaving similarly to him.
And in any case, the response to these murders from muslims was not widespread condemnation of these murders, it was condemnation of france for publishing cartoons and for not being okay with muslim murderers. Muslims are literally more outraged over the cartoons than the murders. So the religion as a whole is not making itself look very good.
And the leader of Iran and former leader of Malaysia have both come out in support of these attacks, both of whom were elected by and have the support of tens of millions of muslims. And dozens of muslim countries have laws against so-called 'blasphemy' and will use violence against those who are 'guilty' of it.
So no, violent opposition to blasphemy is by no means a minority opinion among muslims.
First off, no pope has raped children or nuns, that's just a bold faced lie.
Second, the founder of Islam was literally a pedophile, the founder of Christianity was not. No catholics are okay with pedophillia, whereas marrying children is common and accepted in much of the muslim world. So that was a really, really bad example to use.
I don't think there's a point trying to reason with ignorant people like him who won't listen anyway. Best to just ignoreOMGGGGG
First I ask you, who is the 'founder of Islam' as you see?
Second, have you actually read the Shariah law? Have you truly opened any accurate source to read the actual laws? I know you must have had some experience of researching assignments in high school.. do you know what a source/ reference is? Can you please find a legitimate one that suggests Shariah law in any way encourages violence?
Can you please answer these questions directly and don't divert it with an argument
Speaking of sources, you say 'that's just a bold faced lie'... I, unlike you, did my research, not from one, but from many sources. I am not saying that Christians or Catholics are 'okay' with anything like that, or should even be identified as paedophiles, but yes, many priests have been caught in the act, and I am only emphasising on the point that you seem to say Islam is a violent religion, I am not diverting from the original given mayhem, but simply giving the point that just because a number of people are guilty of an act, it does not mean the religion preaches in such a manner. Unfortunately you seem so dim witted and pathetically unable to do your own research, so please refer to the following sites:
Almost 1,700 priests and clergy accused of sex abuse are unsupervised
An Associated Press investigation found that those credibly accused are now teachers, coaches, counselors and also live near playgrounds.www.nbcnews.comPriest Arrested for Child Rape
abcnews.go.comArgentina: Catholic priests jailed for abusing deaf children
The case shocks Argentina as people accuse the Church of turning a blind eye.www.bbc.comPriest Rape: Latest News, Photos, Videos on Priest Rape - NDTV.COM
Find Priest Rape Latest News, Videos & Pictures on Priest Rape and see latest updates, news, information from NDTV.COM. Explore more on Priest Rape.www.ndtv.comA Denver priest -- his dad’s best friend -- raped him. The state’s Catholic Church abuse report revealed the secret.
Of the 43 priests named in the attorney general’s report on child sex abuse in Colorado’s three Catholic dioceses, the allegations against Monsignor Lawrence St. Peter are extraordinary not only for their breadth, but also for the church’s failure to identify, address and stop his behavior.coloradosun.comCatholic Priests Abused 1,000 Children in Pennsylvania, Report Says (Published 2018)
The grand jury report is the government’s broadest look yet in the United States at child sexual abuse in the church.www.nytimes.comA sordid secret life? Priest, now dead, accused of raping 7-year-old girl, fathering another child
The late Rev. Efrén Neri is accused of raping a 7-year-old and fathering a child out of wedlock in 1958.www.latimes.comBangladeshi Catholic priest accused of raping minor girl - UCA News
Bishop Rozario pledges that suspended priest will not be reinstated unless he can prove his innocencewww.ucanews.comCatholic Church sexual abuse cases - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You've been mistaken. I am a muslim, and I am happy to give you a proper translation of the Qur'an.I have read the Quran. The founder of Islam was a violent warlord who traded slaves and had sex with children.
Disprove a muslim and they mindlessly call you ignorantI don't think there's a point trying to reason with ignorant people like him who won't listen anyway. Best to just ignore
Imagine assuming someone is Muslim because they disagree with you. Go get a hobbyDisprove a muslim and they mindlessly call you ignorant
M_hamm_adOMGGGGG
First I ask you, who is the 'founder of Islam' as you see?
Shariah is law. Law is violently enforced. Shariah is not guidelines, it is not suggestions. It is the violent enforcement of Islam.Second, have you actually read the Shariah law? Have you truly opened any accurate source to read the actual laws? I know you must have had some experience of researching assignments in high school.. do you know what a source/ reference is? Can you please find a legitimate one that suggests Shariah law in any way encourages violence?
I said no popes have raped anyone you utter dullard. Learn to read. You said popes have raped people, which is the part I singed out.Speaking of sources, you say 'that's just a bold faced lie'... I, unlike you, did my research, not from one, but from many sources.
My point is that muslims ARE okay with sex with children, because the holy prophet of islam was a pedophile and child marriage is widespread in teh islamic world.I am not saying that Christians or Catholics are 'okay' with anything like that
ok Sylvia you are the archetype of wokeAnyone who thinks it should be illegal to draw cartoons of the islamic prophet is siding with terrorists and is an extremist.