Apologies in advance for the long post folks, but LeftRightOut has written a lot of disinformation that needs to be addressed!
LeftrightOut said:
Oh so you saying Desmond is an IBO now? Certainly not what he originally claims. There is only one standard show the plan and you know it, anyone who deviates is chastised, in fact the first few plans will be shown with your upline present to make sure you follow the set guide.
Umm, it was you that implied Desmond was being dishonest when he showed the plan. Given such incredible knowledge of what he does and says, I assumed he must have shown you the plan?
Are you admitting you have no idea what Desmond, or indeed myself say?
LeftrightOut said:
What happened to easy 10-15 hours in 2 years be financially free? Don't tell me you never show the plan the proper way either by telling people it's a hard slog?
I dunno, what did happen to it? Disappear when you woke up? Look, if someone told you that, then they misled you. It's certainly much easier than any other business (and I've started several - how about you?) but for most people it's quite tough on top of their jobs.
LeftrightOut said:
You should get out and see more business opportunities then, there are a lot of online opportunities that do not require you to cold canvas strangers in the street at all hours.
Really? That's great. The idea of cold canvassing strangers on the street isn't my idea of a good time. Good thing I don't have to do it.
LeftrightOut said:
An ambot is an ambot he is telling me enough in his posts to let me know he is a good little ambot and would not deviate from the standard STP seeing he uses the same quotes as expected for every rebuttal. Now before you start on further ad hominems how about some facts from you then? What is your vested interest apart from being called in as his upline to argue against a dream stealer?
Upline? Nope, guess again. I have no idea who he is. Never met him. I just enjoy battling ignorance like you display.
LeftrightOut said:
Oh no they upped it 2-5 years now, still 10-15 hours a week though, definitely not HARD is it?
"they"? Who's this "they"? Is it some big conspiracy?
10-20hrs a week for 2-5 years is
easier compared to most things with similar results, but that doesn't make it
easy.
LeftrightOut said:
Average Diamond? haha sources please, give me a quote, even from your beloved amway endorsed literature show me your source please do, your credibility is fleeting, you keep sprouting the same upline talk as all ambots, I am not trying to steal your dream I am just trying to make others see how silly you ambots are. The only way a diamond makes over 190k is from training materials. How many diamonds are in Australia?
www.thisbiznow.com gives average incomes. The payouts are the same in Australia, adjusted for exchange rates.
LeftrightOut said:
How many IBOs? Are you a diamond? Maybe you just worked at it for 4 and a half years, your diamond status is right around the corner only half a year more to go come on nearly there.
mmmhmmm. Or maybe I'm one of those guys that did it in less than 2 years. How about you, please, share your great experience with us? Why should we listen to you?
LeftrightOut said:
But wait! You said 10-15hours and 2-5 years you'll be rich, I refuse to believe that people do not have 10-15 hours a week spare.
Oh! So desmond wasn't the only one who showed you the plan? I did too apparently! I must have since you know so much about what I do. Please, enlighten me as to where and when I said "15hours and 2-5 years you'll be rich"?
LeftrightOut said:
You say it's easy but now you concede lots drop out, so how is it easy to build a good line if people keep dropping out?
Now I "concede"? Concede what? Less than 40% of people who register even buy anything. However ... most of those who
do buy stuff renew. And some of those want to make some money. There's no secret, that's the business.
You're such an expert you didn't even know these things?
Please, explain the significance of 20-12-9-3 and where luck comes in to it.
LeftrightOut said:
You mean it depends on luck of numbers and not my actual work effort now?
LRO, go enrol in that statistics course, you're embarassing yourself.
LeftrightOut said:
You say it's easy but why the big attrition if it's easy and anyone can do it?
And don't forget to add a remedial reading course, then you wouldn't miss -
insider said:
But I guess if you can't argue facts you just have to make stuff up?
insider said:
Are you saying lots of idiots join amway? I think you are saying lots of idiots join amway, now to figure out if they are the ones who hang around or quit that is the hard thing. What abouut a person who joins then quits then joins again? Do they become less of an idiot upon rejoining?
When you've finished arguing with yourself, let me know. What makes you think people who join and then elect not to do anything are idiots?
insider said:
How many would satisfy your curiosity to know what I am talking about? 10? 20? 200? It's a useless question because the next thing you will ask is when I was last active, so if my number is low in mettings you will attack that and if it's outdated you will attack that. But trust me it's a useless argument, amway is still amway.
Just facts would be nice. I ask again, how many Network 21 seminars have you been too? You're such an expert on what we say and do, it must have been many.
insider said:
Of course, everyone is successful right, I bet you drive a lamborghini too and are about to buy the Sydney Harbour Bridge so you can convert it to a lawnbowls green. Sure whatever, predictable.
blah blah blah. Go look in a mirror so you can see who you're arguing with.
insider said:
You keep trying but you keep failing, I really should stop feeding trolls. I think it's time you went back to school.
blah blah blah.
insider said:
After you have a huge serving of humble pie how about you start reading prior lawsuit and rulings since you are now also a lawyer, I quite succinctly gave the reference of the ruling and what the FTC definition how about you take the time (since you have so much spare cos you have so much money) and read the entire thing.
Taken that remedial reading lesson yet? Apparently not. That was not a definition. The FTC doesn't even make definitions. The courts do. But let's see what the FTC
does say -
10. In pyramid schemes, each participant pays money to the scheme's promoter in exchange for the right to recruit new participants. Participants then receive benefits for each individual they recruit or who appears below them in their pyramid (commonly referred to as a "downline"). Earnings in a pyramid are derived primarily from recruiting other participants into the program, not from the bona fide sale of products or services
FTC vs Trek Alliance
49.Defendants operate what is commonly known as a "pyramid scheme." In pyramid schemes, each participant pays money to the scheme's promoter in exchange for the right to recruit new participants. Participants then receive benefits for each individual they recruit or who is added to their downline. Earnings in a pyramid scheme are derived primarily from recruiting other participants into the program, not from the retail sale of products or services.
FTC v Equinox
COUNT 12
(Operation of a Pyramid Scheme)
79. Defendants have violated and continue to violate, NRS § 598.110 by contriving,preparing, setting up, proposing, operating, advertising and promoting a pyramid promotional scheme or endless chain. Defendant Equinox is a pyramid promotional scheme pursuant to NRS § 598.100(3) because it is a program or plan for the distribution of property and merchandise by which a participant gives or pays valuable consideration for the opportunity or chance to receive any compensation or thing of value in return for procuring or obtaining one or more additional persons to participate in the program or plan, or for the opportunity to receive compensation of any kind when a person introduced to the program or plan by the participant procures or obtains a new participant in the program or plan.
Or how about other courts?
B. The Definition of "Pyramid Scheme"
...
The district court's instructions do not appear misleading or incorrect, however. The district court's definition of "pyramid scheme" (by which we and it mean "illegal pyramid scheme") mirrored that used in several other cases. The district court derived the instructions from the FTC's opinion in In re Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 86 F.T.C. 1106 (1975), which enjoined the defendants from, inter alia:2. Offering, operating, or participating in, any marketing or sales plan or program wherein a participant is given or promised compensation (1) for inducing other persons to become participants in the plan or program, or (2) when a person induced by the participant induces another person to become a participant in the plan or program Provided, That the term "compensation," as used in this paragraph only, does not mean any payment based on actually consummated sales of goods or services to persons who are not participants in the plan or program and who do not purchase such goods or services in order to resell them.
and
The Federal Trade Commission has established a test for determining what constitutes a pyramid scheme.
Such contrivances "are characterized by the payment by participants of money to the company in return for which they receive (1) the right to sell a product and (2) the right to receive in return for recruiting other participants into the program rewards which are unrelated to sale of the product to ultimate users" [quoting Koscot]. The satisfaction of the second element of the Koscot test is the sine qua non of a pyramid scheme. . . . We adopt the Koscot standard here and hold that the operation of a pyramid scheme constitutes fraud for purposes of several federal antifraud statutes.
The sine qua non of a pyramid scheme. I'll wait while you go look up what that means.
Or how about we look at the FTC v Amway case that you quoted. Funny how you ignored this part -
OPINION OF THE COMMISSION
BY PITOFSKY, Commissioner:
...
A. Allegations That the Amway Plan Is a Pyramid Scheme
...
The Commission had described the essential features of an illegal pyramid scheme:
Such schemes are characterized by the payment by participants of money to the company in return for which they receive (1) the right to sell a product and (2) the right to receive in return for recruiting other participants into the program rewards which are unrelated to sale of the product to ultimate users. . . . As is apparent, the presence of this second element, recruitment with rewards unrelated to product sales, is nothing more than an elaborate chain letter device in which individuals who pay a valuable consideration with the expectation of recouping it to some degree via recruitment are bound to be disappointed. In re Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 86 F.T.C. 1106, 1180 (1975) (emphasis added), aff'd mem., sub nom. Turner v. FTC 580 F.2d 701 (D.C. Cir. 1978).
But then you never read it did you? You're just spouting BS you read on the 'net somewhere and believed.
And here's a hint for you, you are in over your head. No matter what your silly little book of amwayism tells you the fact remains Amway is safe from one interpretation from the 70s and many of the points protecting amway are no longer enforced directly. YES IT HAS TO DO WITH RETAIL CUSTOMERS AND VOLUME.
Oh, so I see you didn't go look up what a "retail sale" was did you? I warned you that you'd make a fool of yourself. Here's a hint from the ATO site -
Australian Taxation Office said:
retail sale means any sale that is not a wholesale sale.
Now I recommend you go lookup what a wholesale sale is.
A pyramid by definition distributes money within itself from its own members heavily biased towards those at the top without external funds. I hope you are not an active lawyer i'd hate to see your track record. You can quote all the latin you like doesn't make you any more authoritative on the subject. I know what a pyramid scheme is and I know the law surrounding various schemes and how they were prosecuted. Please elaborate where you get your information from because it isn't anythig based in legal precedence in any country I know of.
I base my opinions on courts. You apparently base yours on what you read on the internet by a handful of anti-amway zealots.
BUZZZ Wrong again, read the FTC ruling supplied in previous post. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck then chances are it is not a horse. Only thing stopping it is retailing.
Good thing nobody makes any money in Amway without retail sales then.
I warned you you'd make a fool of yourself.
Since in your opinion I am such a "loser" and dream stealer how about you give me a link to the ATO definition?
Arguing with yourself
again? I never called you either of those things.
I have given links to lawsuits and definitions how about you extend the same courtesy to me? especially since you are the one trying to prove a point, back it up with facts.
I'm trying to prove a point? I responded to your post I recall.
Most money in Amway is made by the tools trade higher up
Speaking of links to evidence, where's your evidence on that? And I'm not interested in the handful of folk who, quite reasonably, make a profit from other companies they've setup. You say "most money". Amway paid out over $2 billion last year around the world, so "most" is an awful lot of money ....
hardly anyone retails and you are pushed to get numbers under you not go out and sell to neighbours.
You really need to check that definition of "retail" don't you...
When was the last time you hit 70% retail or had 10 retail customers (50PV now?). who the heck would retail when you could have another distributor under you.
ahhh, now you're quoting the mythical "70% retail rule"! You really haven't investigated this yourself at all have you? Do you believe
everything you read on the net and just spout it verbatim? There is no 70% retail rule. It's a 70% sales rule, and it means you need to have resold 70% of your volume. If your 1000PV and have a leg that's 700PV, voila it's done. That rule is about preventing, correctly, inventory loading. As for the 50PV rule, if you are authentically operating a business, as per ATO guidelines, then anything you purchase for self consumption is a retail sale by your business to you. Not so hard really is it?
Wow 2 IBOs real impressive, I guess they lived in a cardboard box before "seeing the light" right? never had an income beforehand, no savings ever, they were "losers" until they joined amway and after just 10-15 hours and 5 years they now live in a house on the beach, which they assumedly own. I;ve heard of "fake it till you make it" so keep going, give me hard evidence.
I think you better get another mirror. That argument you're having with yourself is getting quite passionate, I'm worried you might break one.
haha one example, I never said NO ONE makes it NOW, I am saying NO ONE will make it SUPER BIG, Diamond is not super big, and nowhere near 200k a year in amway commissions.
http://www.quixtarwiki.com/index.php?title=Kagan%2C_Ronnie_%26_Jane
4 years to Diamond, Was I not talking about Crown Ambassadors? Just like Desmond?
And if you read what I said, 2 years after they started working. They were just inactive shoppers for a while - they didn't have a business.
And there's a new Australian Crown Ambassador on the way, should be qualified within the next year or so. But is Diamond a "failure" to you is it? Only Crowns good enough? Absurd. Crown Ambassador is a BIG business. Sales in the millions. It takes years. I personally would find it hard to motivate myself past Founder's Executive Diamond (average income >$1,000,000/yr), but then I plan on living a long time, and I enjoy it, so who knows?
Of course, "it's not a pyramid it's a trapezoid" is the classic rebuttal. Now you are being generous with numbers, hundreds or maybe thousands who make a lot more than he does? I doubt he has ever had that many in his downline active at the same time.
He does. Your omniscience is slipping.
Re-read that and see how stupid it sounds. A person who joins now has NO chance of making more than those all the way at the top of the pyramid, the structure is not supportive of that, the absolute top make more in tool sales than the bottom ever will.
You have absolutely no clue at all how this business works do you? A person who joins NOW has EVERY chance of making more than those "all the way at the top". Your statement just goes to show you have no idea how this business works.
It is a pyramid, the guy below you will NEVER have more people than you, simply because if he has a million people under him you will have a million and one.
And how much do I make in that scenario? Zero. How much does he make? Depends on his business structure, but probably more than me.
You've got a classic circular argument. It's a pyramid therefore the guys at the top always make more therefore it's a pyramid ....
After your statistics course, your legal course, and your reading course, I recommend logic.
JOB = Just over Broke. There is only the Amway. Go Diamond! Keep chanting I heard it all at meetings, oh you don't join in? that's a bad little
No meetings I've been at. Sounds like you were part of that group downline of the right-wing evangelicals, I here they do that kind of thing. Their business, they can do it if they want. Not my thing. But you were telling us what
we do, not some other organisation working with the amway opportunity.
ambot bad bad, naughty naughty must join in the chants. Do they make you sit down in turn if you haven't gone core this month or not ordered the water purifier still?
Who is this mysterious "they" that does these things? What do "they" do, kidnap your mother and threaten you or something?
20 hours a week? What happened to 10-15?? is that 20 of showing the plan? or STP and attending meetings? or STP attending meetings and travelling to sites? Never hear the tapes where the people brag about driving X hours to show the plan? Where do you pull the $4k from? Sources please, back up your claims, is that $4k in buying water purifiers? or does it include meetings and tapes and rallies and getaway weekends and "business lunches". You write all that off right? Get back to us when you get an audit sometime.
Sources? me. Never spent more than 4K in a year - well, not unless you are counting all those nice tax writeoffs you can claim when you own your own business.
You have seen their profit and loss and tax records to verify it took $8000 and they make $200k a year just in amway commissions and no tools sales? You know they spent 20 hours a week?
No, I haven't. But I know what it costs me. And I know what I make.
I won't hear them on some tape telling me they left their kids in the car and they faked it till they made it? give me proof, I have proof, I have court documents
You have court documents of the Kagans? Would be fun to read, please post.
uhuh. More people go platinum every year than post these "case studies" on the internet. Though I will grant you one thing, virtually all of them come from that evangelical group you appear to have been a part of.
Not my thing either.
I will just not waste my time fishing them out for a simple ambot troll like yourself until you start giving me some hard facts and showing me you are up to the challenge and not just a typical upline who tries to jump in for his newbie pupil who got involved with someone who knows more than they do.
No idea who Desmond is, I just like trashing the trolls like you.
Sure here's a business for you: domain names. Oh you don't know anything about that business? don't worry all the info is on the internet for free, no tapes needed. Outlay, AU$8 per name, return depends if you sell or commission it. Use your $150 to buy 18 names.
Well, I could do that, but you see, I started one of Australia's first ISPs, and still own a number of internet companies. So I get a
much better buy price than that. Why would I want to pay that much?
Of course you are making that much too aren't you? So is everyone right? You know the Kagans personally yes? You saw their financial records through it all of course, you know they lived in a cardboard box before they joined amway. You know they make $200k purely from amway commission and not tool sales right? You have seen their tax records stating they make 200k a year? of course you do, you're a distributor, other distributors would not lie to you right? What was it again? 10-15 or 20 hours? 2 years or 5? buy for yourself but everyone retails? Keep going, put in some facts next time. Stop using your amway logic on numbers, you will never keep that going without staying active youu have no clue what happens to inactive high pins
Really? I don't? You sure about that? You're omniscience astounds me. Now, you started the claims, you start backing them up. Average incomes are published on thisbiznow.com - do you claim they are lying?
Where are you pulling these numbers from? What makes you think $4k is the amount to sink into the business per year? Sources please, sources sources sources since it's your argument here it's your credibility on the line not mine, I back all of my points up you seem to not be able to.
I pull the numbers out of my accounts, where do you pull yours out of?
10-15 hours in 2-5 years please if I join it's because of the "normal" timeframe as shown in the plan not 20 hours for any amount of years 10-15 is what I am told in the plan and in your post too. Which is it?
You do understand that the plan is a
theoretical model don't you? It's just to get the idea across?
Don't tell me you actually thought you'd go sponsor exactly 6 people, they'd all go sponsor exactly 4 and so on and everyone would buy exactly $300/mth did you!!!
Oh dear. I'm sorry. I really do think some times that there should be some sort of test people need to pass before they join. Most people think it's obvious it's a theoretical model, you apparently missed that part. A shame.
consistency please this is supposed to be easy and foolproof now you're saying it's not? how many Kagans are there? How come they are the only ones you mention?
I mentioned them because there one of those couples in my uplines group that make a lot more than him. You know, that impossibility.
You should hear some of the ridiculous comments ambots make about the business. Amway turns people into obnoxious gits, just look at your first posting in this forum.
It would seem that Amway isn't necessary to make people obnoxious gits.
I was given support by the community when I required it and I am now a productive member of the same community contributing to the overall welfare of the nation by properly paying my taxes as due. Now say it all to anyone who cares, stop twisting things, seem to not have too much problem with my other sums? no argument about $40 a week being a good investment? no? get a clue and stop the ad hominems they just show you have no substance. give me facts, I live in a world of facts not rumours and hearsay.
Uhuh, facts like cherrypicked statements out of court cases to suit your definition of a pyramid, while completely ignoring the section which they head "Defintion of a pyramid"?
How very honest and factual of you. But I'll let you off, 'cause I think you probably just made the mistake of quoting what someone told you, without checking it out yourself. Always dangerous you know!
haha "leeching" oh you are really in the wrong place here. You have no idea as to what my financial situation was when I did my first degree, I am sure your first degree was probably paid for by mummy and daddy or heck you were probably a crown ambassador when you did your first degree right? never needed a hand with anything right? amway all your life born as an Executive Diamond? Foot in mouth much? Seems so.
Hey, you're the guy who said it was profitable because of government payouts, not me. I did my degree the same way, but I don't claim to have made a profit doing it.
why should I have to? I don't see your name on the list of Diamonds otherwise you'd be throwing it at me along with all the spittle.
So are you saying that if I was a diamond that would make your whole argument bunk? That the existence of one diamond would make all the difference? Of course it wouldn't.
Like you, I'm interested in fighting on the publicly available facts about the business, not basing my argument on any given success or any given failure.
So obviously you aren't doing too well, there are people who do well in amway, trust me you are not one of them. The people who do well don't waste their time on a forum on behalf of their silly downline who decided to pick an argument with someone more knowledgable than him.
Ya think? And there you are with that omniscience again. Faulty omniscience alas, but I'm sure that's never stopped you before.
They are too busy recording their next tape of "God wants you to be rich" describing some hard lucuk story and how amway helped them overcome it which you will be buying next month as a must have.
Really? Good thing I never have to listen to anything like that, I'm an atheist. That would definitely put me off.
aha of course, why don't you go read cashflow quadrant by one of your gods (kiyosaki). There are "self employed" opportunities then there are "business" opportunities. Amway at best is a self employment opportunity, if you stop working it you will not be making anything for long, people will drop
Really? I actually left australia 6 years ago. Haven't been back since. My amway business there has produce PV and bonuses
every single month of that six years.
Sounds like you don't know what you are talking about.
off due to attrition and your income will go down, many high pins do not requalify but still claim the pin later on. How many high pins do you NEVER see at functions? they all sign committment and appearance papers to ensure they are publicly visible,
ROFLMAO!!! And they're all actually members of the Illuminati too I heard .... :roll:
heck it's where they make their money so why shouldn't they keep endorsing events. There is no one "retired" who is in amway, those on high levels work just as hard on the circuit as they do in a normal 9-5.
And that money from a2k just keeps on coming in ..... month after month after month ....
Amway is not a business, don't even kid yourself on it, they can yank your downline anytime they feel like it and they have done it to IBOs many times, you are not incorporated as a business,
Man, you have no idea do you. Most higher pins incorporate their businesses, as any sensible business person would do.
you do not have any kind of agreement with amway you just have a catalogue, a handshake and a general set of rules against which they will yank your employee status.
Really? Then what's the contract I sign? :-O
You are a commission based free agent nothing more. You have less rights than an employee and less benefits than a proper business.
So says the self-appointed internet expert.
One thing I will agree on is a lot of people who join have no people skills, that is one thing the tapes do help with is soft skills and motivation, in most cases only for the amway way. You won't see any motivational stuff or advice from anyone not directly involved with Amway in their training tools.
Really? So what's this book I have here on my desk from Stephen Covey. And this tape here from John Maxwell. Or that seminar in the US with Dr Phil. Or that one in Sydney with Kiyosaki (before he began marketing to MLMs). Or this CD here from Ron Jensen. etc etc etc. Or that packet from Zig Ziglar. Or that book ... or that seminar ... or that cd .... etc etc etc
Don't know what business you're talking about, but it's not the same one I've been a part of for 7 years.
It's going good, I help people everyday, I work when I feel like it and I have been overseas for most of last year on holidays and for my employer. I pretty much love my career. i have just come back from 2 weeks overseas and went for a 2 month holiday over Christmas, in 7 weeks or so I will be going to Europe for 2 weeks and end of the year around Asia again. I have been asked to once again return to the UAE but my European commitments would fall right on that so won't be going there for 3 months like last year. My JOB is a 4 letter word to me, GOOD.
Great, I'm happy for you. I love travelling too. Over the last few years I've spent 2 months living on St Barths. 4 months living in Paris. 2 months in Hong Kong, a few weeks in greece, 3 months in the States, visits to russia, italy, egypt, czech republic, switzerland, sweden, norway, finland and probably some I've forgot.
Now I live in Europe, and am building my amway business in multiple countries here. It's a great business if you love to travel. But I have nothing against jobs for those who want them. I just haven't had one for nearly 7 years and don't want one.
Nothing wrong with thinking like employees, but you'd still take my money and sign me up.
If that's what you wanted to do. I believe the best person to make a decision for you, is you.
You admitted to making money with a businesses outside of Amway so I don't think it's fair to say you make money with Amway or have a high ROI just from that. Don't cloud the issue. To anyone contemplating a real business forget Amway go to a New Enterprise Incentive Scheme (NEIS) course offered for free by the government and get some real training for free.
Why not do both? I have multiple businesses, and more on the way. I love starting and building businesses. Amway is just one of those businesses.
And after you learn to reference come back and show me an independent study to prove this.
I recommend people do their own independent study. For SA8 for example, read the instructions, work out the cost per wash. Do it for whatever you're using now. But been warned, don't take the advertising on the front for "number of washes". I've found that number is often based on lightest load, lightest Ph. The number SA8 advertises is for average load, average Ph.
When talking cheaper they are often comparing to other high price catalogue distributuors not the supermarket or weird configurations not available elsewhere.
Last time I did it was just with Woolworths online. A fair comparison. But I'm sure if you really want to spend time shopping around, you can get cheaper. One maxim of business is to never try to be the cheapest - someone will always beat you. I buy SA8 because it works great, it's environmentally friendly, it leaves virtually no residual, and Amway is one of the few multinationals to have signed agreements with PETA.
Can I buy 2 litre bottles of coke or pepsi through amway? why should I have to buy a case of 24x600ml ones?
So don't. Go buy them at the supermarket if you want. Nothing in the contract says you're not allowed to shop elsewhere as well. Do you buy
everything in your life from the same store?
I can get coke at around 99 cents a litre from the supermarket? I follow a balanced diet and exercise no need for pills to make me whole.
Oh ... now don't go there. That PhD I'm considering? It's in nutrition. I know what I'm talking about. Unless you're eating local produced ecological food, then you probably need supplements. And I have enough references to make your eyes bleed.
haha sports stars endorsing products, now you really are showing your level of thinking. They would endorse an enema bag if they got paid for it.
You didn't go read the press release did you? He wasn't approached to endorse the products. His brothers in-laws put him on to it and he tried it. He endorses it because he believes it worked for him - though I assume he gets paid now too.
Yes some people make money on Amway, SOME, most people who join WILL NEVER be making money no matter how hard they work the plan.
Well, that's not true. Our statistics are that less than 1 in 3 registered IBOs even do the recommended work for one month. Only 1 in 500 do it for 12 or more months. IMO it's not coincidental that the number who qualify platinum is about the same. That would indicate that if you do the work, then the results follow.
What we are lousy at doing is getting people started, with over 30% of IBOs never even placing an order after registering. Want to criticise us? Criticise that - it's an abysmal figure.