Yeah in Bio - i was expecting at least high 80's, early 90's - ended up with 76 which i know is bullshit. As i went over my paper i took off marks which were the only ones that could be questionable. I ended up with 80%. Apart from that, i know it's bullshit that someone below me beat me, because im in a different Biology league to them so to speak. It makes me wonder to get the mark i did, i must have achieved a raw mark of 62 ish, which i can guarantee i would have not gone that low - before today ,i have never recieved a mark for Bio below 84%, but i cbf complaining, and wasting money on a shit BOS who can't even put together a fair, and decent system in which rightfully awards students based on their ability, not intertwined or influenced by others marks.
Sorry if that statement seemed cocky, or insolent, but im just a bit shocked, especially as my desired profession will be associated with the subject, and it's mark.
