Australia and New Zealand 'should become one' (1 Viewer)

[ubernuton]

While it might seem like it makes sense for a union, I don't think many kiwis will be for that idea.

Any plausible union would mean the rewriting of the Australian constitution. I'd assume a union between the countries would technically mean NZ becoming a state of Australia. I don't think the NZ parliament (or the people) would be up for merging with a country whose commonwealth government is eroding the powers of the states. Rewriting the powers of the commonwealth to give a completely exhaustive list that won't erode all the powers of NZ, will perhaps ease some fears on the NZ side (and on the side of current Australian states).

But yeah, I sincerely doubt the idea would fare well with kiwis.

well aturely there is a section of the australian contition that would alower it
but i think new zealand would only adsept it if australia were to become part of new zealand

 

[Stevo.]

English motherfucker! Do you speak it?!

 

[PrinceHarry]

Australia and New Zealand have always been one under her Britannic Majesty's reign.

 

[ubernuton]

Australia and New Zealand have always been one under her Britannic Majesty's reign.

get out u english cunt
the monarch is just a lighter form of desspod
australia and new zealand should be republics

 

[PrinceHarry]

Remember australia was discovered, founded, settled, developed and made it to a country called Australia as we see it today by the English. The real owners are the English, others are just overstaying visitors

 

[Gosford]

Remember australia was discovered, founded, settled, developed and made it to a country called Australia as we see it today by the English. The real owners are the English, others are just overstaying visitors

really?
i always thought the real owners were the ABORIGINAL PEOPLE!
i mean, history does tell us english cam here and opressed them (but shhhh...)
discovered? after aboriginal people
settled? yea, to the displeasure of aborignal people
developed? I have to admit here that the english are pretty much 100% responsible for devlopment of australia as a country
real owners english...
i know a lot of aboriginal people that would have a big uproar over that statement
in terms of a political sense, yea english r real owners
but definately not in reality
:burn:

 

[beentherdunthat]

Remember australia was discovered, founded, settled, developed and made it to a country called Australia as we see it today by the English. The real owners are the English, others are just overstaying visitors

Theoretically, god created everything. God owns everything. Humans are the overstaying visitors.

 

[DeathB4Life]

the big bang owns us all.

let us give thanks.

 

[S1M0]

Theoretically, god created everything. God owns everything. Humans are the overstaying visitors.

That does not count as a theory. You and i may believe in a God, but it still does not qualify as a theory.

Reason: Its not scientific, nor does it adhere to even the fundemental princples of science.

 

[beentherdunthat]

That does not count as a theory. You and i may believe in a God, but it still does not qualify as a theory.

Reason: Its not scientific, nor does it adhere to even the fundemental princples of science.

So you are implying that for it to be theoretical, it must be scientific? ... Than tom cruise is the smartest of us all, I presume?

 

[S1M0]

So you are implying that for it to be theoretical, it must be scientific?

Yes. It has to adhere to some form of scientific notion.

 

[PrinceHarry]

really?
i always thought the real owners were the ABORIGINAL PEOPLE!
i mean, history does tell us english cam here and opressed them (but shhhh...)
discovered? after aboriginal people
settled? yea, to the displeasure of aborignal people
developed? I have to admit here that the english are pretty much 100% responsible for devlopment of australia as a country
real owners english...
i know a lot of aboriginal people that would have a big uproar over that statement
in terms of a political sense, yea english r real owners
but definately not in reality
:burn:

Whoever hold political power have real power.

Abos were not oppressed they were enlightened and civilised.

 

[Snaykew]

Yes. It has to adhere to some form of scientific notion.

Like conspiracy theories.

 

[Gosford]

Whoever hold political power have real power.

Abos were not oppressed they were enlightened and civilised.

im sure :rofl: (*sarcasm*)
i thought that type of thinkin went out the window 20-30 yrs ago.
I mean thats what people said to justify it
"it is for their own good" blah blah

About the God reply
i was referring to between humans

 

[jb_nc]

im sure :rofl: (*sarcasm*)
i thought that type of thinkin went out the window 20-30 yrs ago.
I mean thats what people said to justify it
"it is for their own good" blah blah

About the God reply
i was referring to between humans

HEY GOSFORD

you said you wouldnt be back until tuesday

can you fuck off and never post again you stupid muslim

 

[beentherdunthat]

Yes. It has to adhere to some form of scientific notion.

:wave: Hmmm, but that would be assuming the bible/qur'an are not theoretical. But we know they are, and to claim they are not is foolish. So therefore my use of 'Theoretically' in a religious context is fine.

Back to the topic on board, I don't think New Zealand and Australia 'should become one'. Reason? The Government has enough issues without New Zealands problems to add to them. To allow them to 'become one', we'd have to form or alternatively reform the current base of Government house. We'd have to make sure that New Zealand politicians + Australian politicians come together to make common laws, over a common body.

This would mean that everytime government calls, either of the two (preferrably NZ politicians) would have to jump on a jet. This makes things complicated.

EDIT: PLEASE Don't mention our lovely Queen. She's only visited us twice. Oh how cute.