Australian Politics (3 Viewers)

[Lentern]

yes qualified Keynesian and Chicago school economists however its still an economic fallacy so try again

They didn't get these qualifications out of a vending machine, they did research to get those masters and phds.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

They didn't get these qualifications out of a vending machine, they did research to get those masters and phds.

yea just because you have a PhD or masters doesn't mean you're smart it just means your qualified for your job. there are may different schools of economic thought and most of them have people who are professors in the field so your theory is out the window

 

[Ziva]

The lassie fare regulation of the "shadow banking" sector cannot be attributed to be the entire cause of the GFC. After the 01 reccession, the FED was reluctant to raise the domestic interest rate, to slow down growth and thus sacrifice jobs. With the i < i (n), this led to output being above the natural level, as consumption was prosperous.

There was also severe and growing financial imbalances since the AFC in 97 which combined with the share market boom eventually lead to the housing buble burst.

 

[Lentern]

yea just because you have a PhD or masters doesn't mean you're smart it just means your qualified for your job. there are may different schools of economic thought and most of them have people who are professors in the field so your theory is out the window

No, no it isn't out the window its being debated that was my point. You can't treat the infallibility of deregulation as a settled matter, that is why I brought in the academics.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

The lassie fare regulation of the "shadow banking" sector cannot be attributed to be the entire cause of the GFC. After the 01 reccession, the FED was reluctant to raise the domestic interest rate, to slow down growth and thus sacrifice jobs. With the i < i (n), this led to output being above the natural level, as consumption was prosperous.

There was also severe and growing financial imbalances since the AFC in 97 which combined with the share market boom eventually lead to the housing buble burst.

bing bing bing we have a smart person

 

[scuba_steve2121]

No, no it isn't out the window its being debated that was my point. You can't treat the infallibility of deregulation as a settled matter, that is why I brought in the academics.

political economics is a highly debated topic. the point I'm trying to make is that you just can't get X from school of thought Y and because of what X said means its right.

 

[Lentern]

political economics is a highly debated topic. the point I'm trying to make is that you just can't get X from school of thought Y and because of what X said means its right.

How is that different from what you've done but with different x's and y's?

 

[scuba_steve2121]

How is that different from what you've done but with different x's and y's?

because mine make sense

 

[Lentern]

because mine make sense

Yeah but no i was praying earlier today right, and Jesus said mine makes more sense.

 

[scuba_steve2121]

Yeah but no i was praying earlier today right, and Jesus said mine makes more sense.

but Jesus isn't real so you lose

 

[Lentern]

but Jesus isn't real so you lose

More real than market efficiency. HA!

 

[scuba_steve2121]

More real than market efficiency. HA!

yes definitely more real then government interfered with market efficiency

 

[Lentern]

yes defiantly more real then government interfered with market efficiency

Whose it defying exactly?

 

[scuba_steve2121]

Whose it defying exactly?

sorry its late ill fix it

 

[slugboy]

But Rudd wants to censor the internet, which actually makes him a bigger douche.

Therefore Abbott, flawed as he is, is the only choice.

nice one lol

however, its Stephen Conroy who wants to censor the internets. He just asked Rudd "Do you want to end Child Pornography on the internet y/n"

What else could you say without sounding like a pedophile

 

[Lentern]

nice one lol

however, its Stephen Conroy who wants to censor the internets. He just asked Rudd "Do you want to end Child Pornography on the internet y/n"

What else could you say without sounding like a pedophile

Lol no, Conroy is just the poor sod giving the job of selling the clean feed. The filter is Rudd's baby, most of the cabinet would probably hate it.

 

[slugboy]

but Jesus isn't real so you lose

Prove it! Seriously. Prove that he does not exist in any way shape or form. Do not discriminate the Christian Jesus, Yahweh, The Greek's Hermes, the egyptian's Thoth, etc. etc.

By saying that he doesnt exist you are deniying him in every way, simultaneously in every religion.

I dont believe in him, but that DOES NOT MEAN that he does not exist!

 

[Slidey]

Prove it! Seriously. Prove that he does not exist in any way shape or form. Do not discriminate the Christian Jesus, Yahweh, The Greek's Hermes, the egyptian's Thoth, etc. etc.

By saying that he doesnt exist you are deniying him in every way, simultaneously in every religion.

I dont believe in him, but that DOES NOT MEAN that he does not exist!

lolwut

 

[grammarye]

lolwut

+1

Hey, if you don't believe in him, how do you know he does exist?

PS. He does. Aside from the Holy Bible, many first century texts give a brief description of him. Not called Jesus, but 'Yeshua'. Look it up sometime.

 

[slugboy]

+1

Hey, if you don't believe in him, how do you know he does exist?

PS. He does. Aside from the Holy Bible, many first century texts give a brief description of him. Not called Jesus, but 'Yeshua'. Look it up sometime.

I know that.

I believe the term is Agnostic. I don't believe in him, but i still achnoledge the fact that he existed, even though i don't worship him