• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

bad bad bad (1 Viewer)

teehee

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2003
Messages
39
Gender
Female
HSC
2003
That was the absolute hardest legal exam eva!!!!!!!!!

i cant belive i actually ran out of time :(
 

bipo

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2003
Messages
9
that was fucking hard.

How did you answer the crime question on community standards and expectations.
 

LaZy_KoReAn

DrunkenMC
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
1,434
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
I had more than enough time, to plan what to write, think what to write about, and wrote out my essay and i had 20mins left, :)
 

ArChAnGeLz_188

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2003
Messages
15
dodgy crime section ... questions too vague
for the essays you had to think too much lol.... so not enuff time
 

swangal

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
223
Location
London as of 17/6
Originally posted by bipo
that was fucking hard.

How did you answer the crime question on community standards and expectations.
i just wrote about what the motivations 4 punishment were (retribution, detterence, rehab) n crapped on bout them 4 a whil...then went thru all of the punishments n how only some of em meet the communitys expectations and others dont..but law reflects the society in which it operates...meh i just crapped on bout nething.
 

lingling

New Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2003
Messages
6
Crime was horrible. I don't know what all of you mean about running out of time, I had ages left. In question d) I wrote about the objectives of punishment, and the actual penalties and how they are reflective of what society deems reasonable as criminal penalties, and then I used examples like Martin Bryant and Bilal Skaf cases as evidence that sometimes these penalties meet the commuities standards and sometimes they don't. It was an all round dodgy response, but the one about international crime and its effectiveness was far, far worse. They tested international crime in the first new HSC and put everyone off-guard and then the sly buggers did it again!
 

LaZy_KoReAn

DrunkenMC
Joined
Jul 19, 2003
Messages
1,434
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Originally posted by ArChAnGeLz_188
dodgy crime section ... questions too vague
for the essays you had to think too much lol.... so not enuff time
I think i spent half of my time thinking what to write :rolleyes:
 

adamj

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
488
How can people say that there was plenty of time? lol I actually found it quite stranious, the fact is I believe that one should adequately cover all aspects of the course that associate to the question, I did this and I find time to be a tough, although in legal studies it isn't as bad as other subjects.
 

adamj

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2003
Messages
488
Originally posted by bipo
that was fucking hard.

How did you answer the crime question on community standards and expectations.
With the most caution.

This was stupid, community standard refers to utilitarianism, and rule of law - this is Law and Society and it managed to creep its way into crime.

I stated sanctions and how different sancations refelcted standard and the effects it had in the long run, e.g. Prison is effective in incapacitating one, however it costs around $130 a day to hold someone.
 

Ribbon

Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2003
Messages
455
Originally posted by lingling
Crime was horrible. I don't know what all of you mean about running out of time, I had ages left. In question d) I wrote about the objectives of punishment, and the actual penalties and how they are reflective of what society deems reasonable as criminal penalties, and then I used examples like Martin Bryant and Bilal Skaf cases as evidence that sometimes these penalties meet the commuities standards and sometimes they don't. It was an all round dodgy response, but the one about international crime and its effectiveness was far, far worse. They tested international crime in the first new HSC and put everyone off-guard and then the sly buggers did it again!
same sortof thing here - i said the statement should be sometimes not 'always' - said 55year conviction for rape reflected standards, and mostly when there is commuinity outrage its because the media fails to report factors affecting the sentaching decision and judicial discrestion - this led into me talking about what the factors were and a dodgy quote from the DPP :)
 

frenchy

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2003
Messages
120
Location
Sydney
i ran out of time, i had 15mins 2 write one essay!!
so im going to get a really bad mark
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top