• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

Binomial Theorem (1 Viewer)

vds700

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
861
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
lolokay said:
it's the number of ways of choosing 2 from each set of parallel lines, isn't it?
6C2 * 9C2 = 540
thanks man you're a genius!
 

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,998
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
vds700 said:
thanks man you're a genius!
Yeah, that question was confusing. I ended up spending 5 minutes before I realised that it was a combination question.
 

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,998
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
vds700 said:
I think i might have figured (iii) out. You expand it so you get

sum(0 -> n ) (r+1)nCr= sum(0 -> n) r nCr + nCr = n.2^(n-1) +2^n.

And can someone have a look at the last question on that page please. There must be a better way to do it than counting, which i really can't be bothered doing.
I don't think that you expand the question for that. I think you actually have to find a particular expression that describes the sum. But in saying that, I didn't really understand the question.
 

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
lyounamu said:
I don't think that you expand the question for that. I think you actually have to find a particular expression that describes the sum. But in saying that, I didn't really understand the question.
I don't really think there's anything wrong with expanding it. I would imagine that that's how it's meant to be done (considering you've found the expression for each part already)
 

vds700

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
861
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
lolokay said:
I don't really think there's anything wrong with expanding it. I would imagine that that's how it's meant to be done (considering you've found the expression for each part already)
In the solution they do it slightly differently, but they get the same answer.

They multiply (1 + x)^n = nC0 + nC1x +... by x and differentiate, then let x = 1.
 

FDownes

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
197
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
I've got another binomial question that I'm stuck on. It asks;

The coefficients of x4 and x5 in the expansion of (3 - x)n are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign. Find the value of n.
 

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
the coefficients are given by
nCr 3n-r

so:
n!/4!(n-4)! 3n-4 = n!/5!(n-5)! 3n-5
simplifying;
3/(n-4) = 1/5
n=19
 

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,998
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
FDownes said:
I've got another binomial question that I'm stuck on. It asks;

The coefficients of x4 and x5 in the expansion of (3 - x)n are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign. Find the value of n.
x^4: nC4 . 3^(n-4) . (-x)^4

x^5: nC5 . 3^(n-5) . (-x)^5

And since they are opposite in signs (but (-x)^5 is always negative with (-x)^4 always positive):

nC4 . 3^(n-4) . (-x)^4 = -nC5 . 3^(n-5) . (-x)^5
3 . nC4 = x nC5
3n!/(n-4)!4! = x . n!/(n-5)!5!
3n! . (n-5)! . 5! = x . n! . (n-4)! . 4!
3(n-5)! . 5! = x . (n-5)! . (n-4) . 4!
3 . 5! = x .(n-4) 4!
3 . 5 = x(n-4)

But we only take the coefficeints so:

So 15 = n -4
n = 19
 
Last edited:

FDownes

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
197
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
lyounamu said:
nC4 . 3^(n-4) . (-x)^4 = -nC5 . 3^(n-5) . (-x)^5
3 . nC4 = x nC5
3n!/(n-4)!4! = x . n!/(n-5)!5!
3n! . (n-5)! . 5! = x . n! . (n-4)! . 4!
3(n-5)! . 5! = x . (n-5)! . (n-4) . 4!
3 . 5! = x .(n-4) 4!
3 . 5 = x(n-4)
I'm afraid I don't quite follow the lines of working in bold. Where does the (n - 5)! on the right of the fifth line come from? And why does the 4! on the right of the sixth line disappear?
 

lyounamu

Reborn
Joined
Oct 28, 2007
Messages
9,998
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
FDownes said:
I'm afraid I don't quite follow the lines of working in bold. Where does the (n - 5)! on the right of the fifth line come from? And why does the 4! on the right of the sixth line disappear?
Sorry, I may have skipped few lines along the way.

(n-5)! come from (n-4)!. Recall: (n-4)! = (n-5)! . (n-4)

And 5! = 4! . 5
 

FDownes

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
197
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Okay, new question;

a) Simplify 8Ck/8Ck - 1.

[This part is relatively easy, it simplifies to (9 - k)/k].

b) Hence or otherwise, find the greatest coefficient of the expansion of (1 + x)8.

[This part I'm having trouble with...]

Can anyone please help me?
 

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
the greatest coefficient will occur at the maximum value for which 8Ck>8C(k-1)
so 8Ck/8C[k - 1] > 1
(9-k)/k>1
9>2k
k<4.5
so the greatest value of k is 4
8!/4!4! = 70
 

FDownes

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
197
Gender
Male
HSC
2008
Thanks for that.

I seem to be stuck on yet another question, however. I'm not sure what I did wrong, but I just can't seem to get the right answer out. It asks;

Find the greatest coefficient of (2x - 1)5.

It should be fairly simple. The answer is apparently +/-80.
 

lolokay

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2008
Messages
1,015
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2009
the coefficient of the rth term is given by (I'm letting the first coefficient be r=0)
(-1)r25-r 5!/r!(5-r)!
we want to find the lowest value of the coefficient such that it is greater in magnitude than the coefficient after it (or however you like to set it up. You can find the greatest coefficient such that it is greater than the coefficient before it)
ie.
25-r 5!/r!(5-r)! > 24-r 5!/(r+1)!(4-r)!
which you simplify to:
2/(5-r) > 1/(r+1)
2r + 2 > 5 - r
r > 1
Since it comes out to be an integer, I think you can assume the the coefficients for 2 (the lowest number to make the inequality true) and 1 (if you replace the > with >=) will have the same coefficient.

if we substitute r=1,2 into the formula (-1)r25-r 5!/r!(5-r)!
we get -+80.
(-1)r25-r 5!/r!(5-r)!
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top