In terms of work load, bio < physics < chem. Unfortunately, although Chem is my favourite, it requires you to remember many details and each module has many references to previous material. Either way, its the most interesting one!
I think this is the best advice. I needed Chem and Bio for my course, and I had no knowledge of Chem. I did a bridging course, but I already feel behind.Originally posted by Lazarus
I'd strongly recommend choosing the science which is most appropriate for your desired university degree.
bio is more memory, supposedly takes less time and is easier. but in the end you bang 6 is not equivalent to a band 6 in chem (for uai scaling purposes)Originally posted by evafree_creazn
hilo,
im a 05'er pickin sciences dis year . ... i lik bio but im good at mathy stuff. graduates who did physics and/or biology/chem... i reli envy your intelligence in science. i would appreciate it so much if u could tell me which of them takes more time to do well in... and is physics really math ish..~?
thx soso much,,~
??? I find physics to be the hardestOriginally posted by nekkid
I'd choose Bio and Physics... both require substantially less work than Chem, and are a lot easier to score higher in. That's my opinion though.
mm same here. i find that the concepts and understanding is hard. but its good for maths to some extent. i'm a bio freak and for chem, i'm understanding, its just physics that just is worrying me. Pick the subs you want and dont let the "appealing" scaling get to you because all three science is not going to be fun (unless you get a kick out of it like me )Originally posted by Calculon
I find physics to be the hardest