Gavrillo- Very impressive stuff! I found that very engaging and the political message was potent and sophisticated. It's very easy to visualise and there are many powerful, confronting images. It's clear that you have a 'vision' for this play. Although at times I found the stage-directions a little excessive. They seem quite prescriptive, in the sense that there isn't much room for interpretation on the directors part. You probably justify this in your RS, and I suppose it's important for ext 2 to make your intentions really clear.
The extensive use of real speech from your various political and historical figures is mostly interesting and at times enlightening. I never knew that some governement ministers were so ignorant *downer*. However, it sort of makes me wonder about the originality of it... like, quite a bit was not directly written by you. Don't get me wrong, it's very effective in communicating your message, and I suppose if one was to veiw your MW as a construction of various existing literature, speechs and other media, then it's all good. I just would've liked to have seen more of your own interpretation of the 'real' people in your play, like, you writing dialogue that you might think they'd say or something along those lines... a scene with Howard and Jannete having a bed-time discussion relating his political performance to his sexual prowess would be hilarious... though probably not too appropriate, but anyway.
Running on from that point, the 'monologue' format of your play (characters delivering didactic dialogue to the audience) was effective but became somewhat predictable. A little more character relationships and characters interacting with eachother would've gone down well with me, but it might just be a personal preference. The 'actor' to me could have been more of an individual character. Although his role is as a narrator of sorts, I think that he could've become a real character in the play, possibly intervening more and meddling in events... the Prospero of sorts, the revisionist historian, or maybe you in disguise. Then again, you do declare it to be a 'history play' so maybe it was best to have portrayed things as they truly happened. Having said this, the actors dialogue is easy to understand and sophisticated at the same time, and probably serves your purpose aptly.
Some sections, like the NOFX bit, made me question the 'producability' of the play ie- it might be difficult to be staged as you've written it. Actually, it wouldn't be that hard, it'd just have to be a fairly large production team with skillful actors who can pull off a good impersonation.
The comic relief/black humour (especially the "burlesque mockery") worked well and created a nice juxtaposition to the confronting nature of the scenes that surround it.
I hope I haven't offended with some of my comments. It is really quite good I think. I enjoyed it a lot, thought it was theatrical, and was captivated by it. Well done!