But not the opportunity to choose our prescribed textsYes why wouldn't they be able to?
You have opportunities to choose related texts that encompass rediscovery
Stacks!But not the opportunity to choose our prescribed texts
But seriously how many rediscoveries are there in The Tempest? I can only think of 1 or 2...
I wouldn't say Miranda is "rediscovering" her past, as it isn't the second time she's discovering it, it's her first time. Prospero isn't also "rediscovering", he's "discovering" that the "rarer action is in virtue rather than in vengeance", it seems like you're just using the idea of rediscovery without really knowing how it works.Stacks!
Miranda rediscovering her past
Alonso rediscovering Ferdinand (thought he was dead)
Prospero rediscovering forgiveness and relationship with his brother
Caliban and Ariel rediscovering freedom
The whole cast rediscovering order (overthrown from when boatswain takes command)
If you ask me, rediscovery is the biggest part of The Tempest!!!
OK your problem - if you're not flexible and a little bit of a bullshitter then you're probably in strife. English is about being to adapt and prove it. Good luck mateI wouldn't say Miranda is "rediscovering" her past, as it isn't the second time she's discovering it, it's her first time. Prospero isn't also "rediscovering", he's "discovering" that the "rarer action is in virtue rather than in vengeance", it seems like you're just using the idea of rediscovery without really knowing how it works.
I strongly doubt that they would be that specific about "childhood discoveries" in the HSCDo you guys think they can ask specific things that aren't really in the rubric?
E.g. there is a 'past' paper floating around and the whole paper asks about childhood discoveries. Would this ever be in the HSC? I don't get how they can ask something so specific, how the hell are we suppose to know the nature of childhood discoveries??
Hmm I might have seen that paper (or at least a part of it... and I'm pretty sure the paper itself is non-representative of the HSC nor trial papers). I highly doubt that they'd ask something to be specific, but it's possible, considering just how eclectic the concept of a discovery can be (e.g. childhood discoveries may rationalised as the combination rediscoveries, curiosity, sudden/unexpected discoveries, et cetera). Something like that have pretty much zero chance of appearing as the HSC extended response question. Paper 2 however is a different story; they can quite specific. But regarding your question - I wouldn't worry about it. It's not a definite "no", but it's very close to it.Do you guys think they can ask specific things that aren't really in the rubric?
E.g. there is a 'past' paper floating around and the whole paper asks about childhood discoveries. Would this ever be in the HSC? I don't get how they can ask something so specific, how the hell are we suppose to know the nature of childhood discoveries??
No way. The word childhood isn't even mentioned in the rubric so that's pretty dog if they do. And as said before that is sooo specific they'd effectively be nulllifying a large percentage of candidatesDo you guys think they can ask specific things that aren't really in the rubric?
E.g. there is a 'past' paper floating around and the whole paper asks about childhood discoveries. Would this ever be in the HSC? I don't get how they can ask something so specific, how the hell are we suppose to know the nature of childhood discoveries??
the thing is my prescribed material, Wrack, only has perhaps 1 or 2 at the very maximum rediscoveries.To excel in English, you must be able to take the smallest, most desperate ideas, and overextend them beyond what they are.
If the question is on rediscovery and you have no clue what to do, as a last resort, argue that your protagonists are rediscovering their sense of discovery. Boom. Band 7.
No but seriously, if the question doesn't suit your preparation well, don't panic and look for the smallest or the broadest ideas to work with. It's always worked for me, and I was forced to use a poem I didn't read for over half a year and still managed 17/20 somehow (I honestly have no clue how that one worked out well).
English... is the art of pretension.
You're doing 'Wrack'?! So am I! It's such a piece of wrack.the thing is my prescribed material, Wrack, only has perhaps 1 or 2 at the very maximum rediscoveries.
I feel like HSC will ask a duel question of two parts, like the one posted above by tigerian
Don't really know your texts, but I'm pretty sure you can definitely bs your way through them. For 'The Road Not Taken', you can focus on discussing the idea of the rediscovery of humanity's curiosity/sense of discovery, if you can't think of anything else.I think the question will be very broad not specific HOPEFULLY...But talking about rediscovery, how would I link the 'Road Not Taken" and "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" to rediscovery??