Catholic Trials f*ck up (2 Viewers)

[r.haidar]

u know what i think? i think the media is distorting the truth guys !!!

*captain obvious never did know when to shut the fuck up*

 

[christina88]

we don't have to sit the exams again because we were not advantaged in any way.

and ..nsb represent? lol i heard some of those guys have never said a word before the news interview. i dont think your 'quality' opinions are shared by everyone in your school either.

anyway, this is so stupid. bye.

 

[schmo]

"You doin ho activities, With ho tendencies, Hos are your friends and hoes are your enemies"

in other words Cheltham sux, and should shutup, becuase they dont have to sit 2 2 hour exams again ...

Thanks for expressing your opinion, but I don't see how personally attacking individuals will achieve anything.
Besides it is a possibility that we do have to sit the exams again purely out of goodwill, so there is no way someone can turn around and say we had an advantage.

 

[bshoc]

we don't have to sit the exams again because we were not advantaged in any way.

and ..nsb represent? lol i heard some of those guys have never said a word before the news interview. i dont think your 'quality' opinions are shared by everyone in your school either.

anyway, this is so stupid. bye.

yeah most of us dislike cheltham more than those interviewed ...

 

[goan_crazy]

Cheltenham arent even catholic
next year CSSA should restrict it to catholic schools.

 

[christina88]

yeah, our girls probably rejected you nsbs no need to be a sore loser

 

[bshoc]

Thanks for expressing your opinion, but I don't see how personally attacking individuals will achieve anything.
Besides it is a possibility that we do have to sit the exams again purely out of goodwill, so there is no way someone can turn around and say we had an advantage.

yaaay so some school we'll beat anyway has to sit theirs again ... how does it make the other schools position any better?

clue: it doesent

 

[schmo]

yeah most of us dislike cheltham more than those interviewed ...

Ok, fine we understand that you do not like Cheltenham but the students do not need you to personally attack them and constantly abuse them. There has been enough done as it is. Must you keep blaming the students?! It was a MISTAKE, mistakes happen and that's life.

 

[Danoz The Great]

Get over it. As I've already explained, no sane person is still blaming Cheltenham Girls. Get over your self pity and pride and just be a normal Cheltenham Girl and chase those guys all you want.

I think YOU are the one that needs to get over it mate. Leave them alone, they've answered all the allegations all through here and made themselves clear. And all you can say is 'get over it'? Yeah, nice.

 

[Digital_Spork]

Concord has to do it teusday and wednesday next week.

2 advantages, 2 more days off school, and good practice. Cant blame the girls for it and I dont think restricting the papers to catholic schools will help that cause any more.
Most stupid thing is that our principal said that some of us had 'interesting' results... jeez, thanks for accusing us of cheating!

 

[r.haidar]

Cheltenham arent even catholic
next year CSSA should restrict it to catholic schools.

i agree!

i am just filling up characters because...

The following errors occurred when this message was submitted:
1. The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters.

 

[schmo]

yaaay so some school we'll beat anyway has to sit theirs again ... how does it make the other schools position any better?

clue: it doesent

Ok, if that is the way you feel, fine. I will continue to stand by my words. You are perfectly entitled to your own opinion and I accept that.

 

[Raginsheep]

yeah, our girls probably rejected you nsbs no need to be a sore loser

Its not like we're losing anything

 

[bshoc]

Ok, fine we understand that you do not like Cheltenham but the students do not need you to personally attack them and constantly abuse them. There has been enough done as it is.

ok

Must you keep blaming the students?!

so uhhh the teachers leaked it then?

It was a MISTAKE, mistakes happen and that's life.

yeah mistakes like the establishment of Cheltham Girls



j/k

 

[bshoc]

yeah, our girls probably rejected you nsbs no need to be a sore loser

yeah there are just some things in life too chatt to accept ... like cheltham ... ehehe

 

[SSaint]

Ok, fine we understand that you do not like Cheltenham but the students do not need you to personally attack them and constantly abuse them. There has been enough done as it is. Must you keep blaming the students?! It was a MISTAKE, mistakes happen and that's life.

the point i suspect he is making, is that some degree of fault could be linked with your 'peers', the papers didnt leak themselves you know, and i doubt your school did... put two and two together, it shouldnt be that hard, even for a cheltenham student

 

[christina88]

ur right..cheltenham girls can't simply get over like that guy said. they've been verbally abused, harrassed, personally attacked.. and now also egged at the station. on top of the bullshit media reports.

real humane, the world we're living in.

 

[helper]

The students were not told they were looking in part at paper other students would be using. They didn't know not to discuss it. Similarly a lot of schools do papers on different days, NEAP, STANSW, Independent, ARC and a pile of others. This is why the moderators on here keep saying don't discuss trials.

 

[snoopy05]

schmo723,

man, this is out of topic, but i really admire you. u been hanging around this thread for the past days to stand up for your own school's integrity and reputation =)

hey you boys back off!! dont blame the girls at cheltenham!
*so hey wats your name?*

 

[Danoz The Great]

next year CSSA should restrict it to catholic schools.

Pfft. As if that'd work, answers could still be leaked out couldn't they? *rolls eyes*

What needs to be done, although I'm not for it, is that Trials need stricter guidelines by BOS, eg ensuring all (CSSA + Independant!) examinations are done the same time. But because the trials are an internal examination this probably wouldn't work and is probably too stringent for such an assessment.