Originally posted by Xayma
And thats what Im trying to show. But I cant find any Wait if b=c=d=0 ax^4=0 only has one root, So it isnt true to say...
The problem with that answer is that the proof originally discounted x = 0 as a root, and thus d <> 0. However, the question can still be easily done.
Take a set of values, like a = d = 1, and b = c = 2, which satisfy the required result bc = 4ad. We know that,
if it has a triple root,
then it's at x = -b / 2a = -2 / 2(1) = -1. But x = -1 does not satisfy x<sup>4</sup> + 2x<sup>3</sup> + 2x + 1 = 0. Therefore there is no triple root, and so the answer is "no".
To check, you could solve x<sup>4</sup> + 2x<sup>3</sup> + 2x + 1 = 0 (difficult) or sketch y = x<sup>4</sup> + 2x<sup>3</sup> + 2x + 1, which has only two roots, neither of them a triple root (as y <> 0 when y'' = 0).
If anyone is interested, x<sup>4</sup> + 2x<sup>3</sup> + 2x + 1 factorises to [x<sup>2</sup> + (1 + sqrt(3))x + 1][x<sup>2</sup> + (1 - sqrt(3))x + 1], and the solutions of x<sup>4</sup> + 2x<sup>3</sup> + 2x + 1 = 0 are:
x = [-1 - sqrt(3) +/- 4throot(12)] / 2 and x = [sqrt(3) - 1 +/- i * 4throot(12)] / 2