• Best of luck to the class of 2025 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here

Class of 2025 (2025 HSC CHAT) (52 Viewers)

parmesean

Well-Known Member
I'm feeling green ykyk? Cause it's too dark for yellow but too light for red
my favourite maths extension 2 tactic "proof by intuition"

therefore true cos i think this = that + a drawing of a flower tends to get you 1/4 marks
 

killer queen

guaranteed to blow your mind
Joined
Oct 21, 2024
Messages
684
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
my favourite maths extension 2 tactic "proof by intuition"
“by inspection” but you have no idea what I’m inspecting

im watching epicmaths do mx2 and im just like wondering if i was either away for half of last year or if this paper is just that horrendous
hoping it genuinely was that bad so the alignment is godly
 

hellokitty48920

Active Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2024
Messages
289
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
ancient history folks doing the greek world how do u Usually structure ur essays for this
usually the question is always smth like to what extent/assess ___ and it basically asks how "successful" or "effective" (diff wording) smth is from memory, I usually go with 2 paras on my stronger argument (probably agreeing), then 1 counterargument which either impedes on the "success", thereby limiting it OR when its a different factor that contributed to make smth 'successful/effective' or wtv.
Sorry if this doesnt make sense lol it makes sense in my head 😭 Also pretty sure u can go with 3-4 body paras.

for example:
Screenshot 2025-10-22 at 7.15.03 pm.png

Plan:
- Yes his contributions were very significant (if this is ur stance) - 2 paras on them, kinda centre them on a "theme" ig like one on naval etc etc
- However, he wasn;'t the only individual who contributed to greek victory as... another individual u think did great, for example Leonidas or Miltiades... 1 para

OR: ur argument could be purely on him but maybe one para where he went wrong/didn't contribute greatly (again, ur choice - have relevant evidence for all of this)
- then u can say smth like Themistocles contributed to GV in the Persian wars to a moderate extent/ significant extent however ______ slightly impedes on this, thus rendering his contributions to GV to be of a moderate extent.

sorry for the yap if this doesn't;t help at all, but overall my tips:
- VERY clear thesis - can be the end of ur intro but ensure ur introducing sentence answers Q
- just elaborate a little bit in intro, mention of what ur body paras abt
- IF RELEVANT, mention reoccurring historians
- last sentence ties up & reiterates ur point - makes ur thesis CLEARR!! (UNDERLINE so markers can see)
Bodies:
- thesis statement specific to that body which is ur agreement/disagreement
- explain stuff according to wtv the Q asks, implement sources, analyse ur sources on their usefulness, what they reveal, reliability/limitations/bias - dont overdo it unless it is a source based Q, this is usually for ancient sources. have modern sources too, although I don't think its VERY necessary to analyse these - maybe js mention that they're more reliable due to research/proof check etc
- do this as much as u need for taht body js make sure it proves ur point & isn't tooooo much cos its ur opinion ur just using the sources to back u up
overall always have a link to the Q in opening and closing of all ur paras and make sure ur approach is thematic.

again sorry if I didn't explain this well or made typos cos i'm rushing rn I need to revise!!😭 Good luck!! I absolutely HATE greek world
 

cloudqlia

Active Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2025
Messages
173
Location
roblox arsenal
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
usually the question is always smth like to what extent/assess ___ and it basically asks how "successful" or "effective" (diff wording) smth is from memory, I usually go with 2 paras on my stronger argument (probably agreeing), then 1 counterargument which either impedes on the "success", thereby limiting it OR when its a different factor that contributed to make smth 'successful/effective' or wtv.
Sorry if this doesnt make sense lol it makes sense in my head 😭 Also pretty sure u can go with 3-4 body paras.

for example:
View attachment 49825

Plan:
- Yes his contributions were very significant (if this is ur stance) - 2 paras on them, kinda centre them on a "theme" ig like one on naval etc etc
- However, he wasn;'t the only individual who contributed to greek victory as... another individual u think did great, for example Leonidas or Miltiades... 1 para

OR: ur argument could be purely on him but maybe one para where he went wrong/didn't contribute greatly (again, ur choice - have relevant evidence for all of this)
- then u can say smth like Themistocles contributed to GV in the Persian wars to a moderate extent/ significant extent however ______ slightly impedes on this, thus rendering his contributions to GV to be of a moderate extent.

sorry for the yap if this doesn't;t help at all, but overall my tips:
- VERY clear thesis - can be the end of ur intro but ensure ur introducing sentence answers Q
- just elaborate a little bit in intro, mention of what ur body paras abt
- IF RELEVANT, mention reoccurring historians
- last sentence ties up & reiterates ur point - makes ur thesis CLEARR!! (UNDERLINE so markers can see)
Bodies:
- thesis statement specific to that body which is ur agreement/disagreement
- explain stuff according to wtv the Q asks, implement sources, analyse ur sources on their usefulness, what they reveal, reliability/limitations/bias - dont overdo it unless it is a source based Q, this is usually for ancient sources. have modern sources too, although I don't think its VERY necessary to analyse these - maybe js mention that they're more reliable due to research/proof check etc
- do this as much as u need for taht body js make sure it proves ur point & isn't tooooo much cos its ur opinion ur just using the sources to back u up
overall always have a link to the Q in opening and closing of all ur paras and make sure ur approach is thematic.

again sorry if I didn't explain this well or made typos cos i'm rushing rn I need to revise!!😭 Good luck!! I absolutely HATE greek world
WOW UR A GOD FOR THIS. THANK YOU SO MUCH I OWE U MY LIFE
 

quokka

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2025
Messages
1,613
Location
hanging myself
Gender
Female
HSC
2025
usually the question is always smth like to what extent/assess ___ and it basically asks how "successful" or "effective" (diff wording) smth is from memory, I usually go with 2 paras on my stronger argument (probably agreeing), then 1 counterargument which either impedes on the "success", thereby limiting it OR when its a different factor that contributed to make smth 'successful/effective' or wtv.
Sorry if this doesnt make sense lol it makes sense in my head 😭 Also pretty sure u can go with 3-4 body paras.

for example:
View attachment 49825

Plan:
- Yes his contributions were very significant (if this is ur stance) - 2 paras on them, kinda centre them on a "theme" ig like one on naval etc etc
- However, he wasn;'t the only individual who contributed to greek victory as... another individual u think did great, for example Leonidas or Miltiades... 1 para

OR: ur argument could be purely on him but maybe one para where he went wrong/didn't contribute greatly (again, ur choice - have relevant evidence for all of this)
- then u can say smth like Themistocles contributed to GV in the Persian wars to a moderate extent/ significant extent however ______ slightly impedes on this, thus rendering his contributions to GV to be of a moderate extent.

sorry for the yap if this doesn't;t help at all, but overall my tips:
- VERY clear thesis - can be the end of ur intro but ensure ur introducing sentence answers Q
- just elaborate a little bit in intro, mention of what ur body paras abt
- IF RELEVANT, mention reoccurring historians
- last sentence ties up & reiterates ur point - makes ur thesis CLEARR!! (UNDERLINE so markers can see)
Bodies:
- thesis statement specific to that body which is ur agreement/disagreement
- explain stuff according to wtv the Q asks, implement sources, analyse ur sources on their usefulness, what they reveal, reliability/limitations/bias - dont overdo it unless it is a source based Q, this is usually for ancient sources. have modern sources too, although I don't think its VERY necessary to analyse these - maybe js mention that they're more reliable due to research/proof check etc
- do this as much as u need for taht body js make sure it proves ur point & isn't tooooo much cos its ur opinion ur just using the sources to back u up
overall always have a link to the Q in opening and closing of all ur paras and make sure ur approach is thematic.

again sorry if I didn't explain this well or made typos cos i'm rushing rn I need to revise!!😭 Good luck!! I absolutely HATE greek world
im going to do good in every section besides the greek world
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 51)

Top