pman
Banned
you can believe what you believe, most professional scientists I've talked to don't agree with global warming.Of course, a scientific consensus does not prove anything. But the established consensus for anthropogenic global warming is supported by pretty much all of the worlds most credible and reliable scientific institutions, this is enough assurance for me to at least be sure that this is no scam or publicity stunt. At the very least this should mean that you look at the evidence in a few more layers of detail and try to break the barrier of confirmation bias.
the is no comparison given, you have one image showing oh's, you need twoNatural equilibrium systems work steadily, excess CO2 cannot just simply be absorbed by oceans indefinitely. A drop in pH levels due to anthropogenic CO2 has already been established as factual, and we are beggining to observe some effects of it.
Below is the surface level pH drop between 1700s and the 1990s.
whoops, just saw the delta and the double negative, the graph actually depicts a slight increase in pH
This is to be expected, the climate changes by itself anywayFlooding and severe thunderstorms and hurricanes in other areas.