To what extent does the representation of individuals within your prescribed text reflect the anomalies, paradoxes and inconsistencies inherent in the human experience?
Vast exposure to the portrayal of pessimistic individual life experiences invites contemporary readers to broaden their understanding of anomalies, paradoxes and inconsistencies engrossed via human experiences. <-- great start! George Orwell’s ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four’ (1984) <-- avoid using inverted commas for text titles as they can be easily confused with textual quotes (for evidence); italicise text titles if typing or underline if handwriting utilises elements inof a dystopian society to explore themes of control and existentialism <-- get away from talking about "themes" and briefly describe how control and existentialism link to Orwell's context and your contemporary context - also link to the question! conveyed through the character of Winston Smith. <-- specifically and fully address the question in this sentence; this is your thesis statement! Elements inherent in this dystopian society significantly attribute the representation of entrapping human experience that is ruled through authority and fear to govern individuals in 1984. Evidently, the portrayal of the human experience in 1984 can be recognised by the audience presented by various anomalies, paradoxes and haphazard <-- this word is an adjective and thus doesn't make grammatical sense here.
AThe world of inhumanity and despair in 1984 where self-identity is extinguished and replaced by mindless devotion is a portrayal of individuals' via inconsistencies and anomalies. Orwell highlights the theme of control <-- again, don't talk about "themes"; talk about how control affects individuals and highlights their inconsistencies and anomalies over the populace of 1984 described by Winston. “There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment” whereby this quote <-- improve quote integration and try not to use such large quotes uses a diction voice <-- this is not a technique; what kind of technique are you trying to refer to in other words? to establish the atmosphere of trepidation and constant surveillance from Winston’s character to exemplify the loss of independence and identity through drifting apart from contemporary societies as an anomaly representing the individual human experiences. <-- sentence wayyyy too long. link to question needed to conclude the para
Inconsistencies of the individual human experience with relapses of past memories occur with Winston <-- is this the end of the sentence? ``Within twenty years at most, he reflected never use past tense when describing the events of a text - only present tense, the huge and simple <-- way too informal question ‘Was life better before the Revolution than it is now?’” is the primary tool of control and use of didactic diction significantly evokes the level of doubt towards society from Winston and his persona represented through human experience inconsistencies inherent in Winston. Moreover, the pursuit of Winston’s existentialism is a prevalent notion conveyed through writings in his diary, “Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows” where this quote encompasses the motif of “2 plus 2 equals 5” is an implicit contradiction to Winston’s belief as an anomaly in society restricting expression of humanistic values due to forcefully following the conundrum in portraying oppressive society in 1984 of meaningless existence of life during the time. Additionally, the quest for existentialism is the main convention of Winston’s character and importance to represent individuality in a dystopian society. Evidently, contemporary societies can reflect upon themes present in individual human experiences; to a significant extent 1984 excels in portraying loss of individuality through anomalies and inconsistencies.
Collective human experiences are essential to illustrate the atmosphere engrossed by paradoxes and themes. Subtle uses of the triad are highlighted in 1984 when mentioning the words of “Oceania, Eastasia and Eurasia”, usesing tricolon to essentially represent the completion of the party attempting to perpetuate it as a method of control. <-- reword; awkward phrasing here On the contrary, triads imply the notion the party is omnipotent and omnipresent which promotes utilitarianism. “War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength” establishes the paradox the ironic truth of Oceania’s prevalent slogan where recognised by Winston’s existentialist notions but blindly followed by the Proles in 1984. Additionally, Orwell’s use of caliginous <-- this is a literary term; not sure if it's appropriate for use in an analytical essay - would be better for a creative piece reality illustrates the collective human experience to reflect on paradoxes evident in 1984 “The society he lives in strips its citizens not only of their freedom but of their very humanity.” the word “strips’ exemplifies the hyperbole link to breach of individuality and lack of freedom present in 1984’s oppressive regime. Ultimately, use of triads emphasises the pessimistic collective experience and demonstrates the subtle reverberation within Proles as a portrayal of paradoxes, while a lack of individuality and freedom hinders meaningful human existence. <-- good conclusion!
To conclude, inconsistencies, paradoxes and anomalies precisely establish control and existentialism. <-- relate to human condition, as question asks Evidently, accentuated in Orwell’s dystopian society the portrayal of collective and individual human experiences are influenced by the pessimistic atmosphere of constant surveillance and calingious caliginous <-- this is a literary term; not sure if it's appropriate for use in an analytical essay - would be better for a creative piece reality regarding lack of individuality & freedom. <-- this sentence doesn't make grammatical sense In contrast, Winston's revenge on the existential paradigm is essential to reflect upon aforementioned core themes to a significant extent regarding the instability of human experiences. final philosophical statement needed (maybe can finish off with a unique quote from a critic that simultaneously doesn't open a whole new can of worms in your essay)
Thanks for your feedback in advance.
I can't really comment further, I suppose, since I've never actually read or had to study the play 
Who knows - maybe if it was a well-written ending, I might've found a reason to like it!