Comp 1011 Assignment 2 (1 Viewer)

[redslert]

too soon

 

[Ragerunner]

This Monday....

He said you can get it going decently in 5-6 extra lines....i mean... wtf ?

 

[Ragerunner]

writing a function that checks what happens when "pl play"(Action) is a suggestion(use isAccuse)(ie checks wether the suggestion is correct .

ok say i managed to write a function to do that, how would i modify the line lambert gave us to make use of the function?

 

[redslert]

ok
you will have to use gaurds to check if it is an accusation, if not it is a suggestion

yes you will have to completely alter the line which is in the stub file

hmmm well that's what i didn't but i'm not even sure if it is right?!

the most important part of the line

(Just (pl, play pl), Nothing, Just (CdG (pls ++ [(pl,cards)]) ans))

is

play pl

the rest is use later when you form a proper argument for accuse

 

[Ragerunner]

how did u alter it redslert?

I got absolutely no idea...

 

[redslert]

oki i guess giving u this small part to start off won't kill
but i'm not even 100% sure that it works because right now i'm not 30% through the programing....

step (CdG ((pl,cards): pls) ans)
| isAccuse (play pl) == True = accBAH
| otherwise = sugBAHBAH

 

[cyrax83]

instead of saying we couldn't do it, lets say we wanted to be radiculs and protested to this bullshit assignment because of it's bullshitten-tecity (yes i know thats not a word)

 

[Ragerunner]

I liked the way how he said a few lectures ago that "This is actually pretty easy".....then the everyone started laughing.......

I can't wait for Haskell to be over. Only a few more weeks...

 

[Constip8edSkunk]

Originally posted by Ragerunner
how did u alter it redslert?

I got absolutely no idea...

theres 2 basic ways to approach step, one is to divide step into correct accusation, wrong accusation, suggestions etc and provide the output triple for each case(using guards). the other is to approach the triple in as 3 parts and apply the different conditions to them separately(using guards ....and lots of subfunctions/where clauses).

Originally posted by redslert
oki i guess giving u this small part to start off won't kill
but i'm not even 100% sure that it works because right now i'm not 30% through the programing....

step (CdG ((pl,cards): pls) ans)
| isAccuse (play pl) == True = accBAH
| otherwise = sugBAHBAH

you can just write isAccuse (play pl) = accBAH

 

[redslert]

this sux!!

NOTHING WORKS!!!!!

 

[Ragerunner]

im dead.....

 

[redslert]

i died

lol tim lambert replies to posts on the cse forum at 2.20am

doesn't any body sleep!?

 

[Ragerunner]

oh man...few days left....

 

[redslert]

lol i found out so many people haven't even started yet....
also only half the people turned up today for the lecture and the labs were jam packed!

 

[Ragerunner]

I was the one that left the lecture as soon as he finished talking about the assignment

 

[Ragerunner]

ConstipatedSkunk, can you give me a list of all the functions you made?

Not the code, just the function name so I know what I need to make myself..

e.g.

checkName
checkSuggestion

etc....

 

[redslert]

OMG I FINISHED!!!!!!!

OMG OMFG!!

i can't believe it!!

TOOK LIKE JUST FUKIN 3days and NIGHTS!

so HAPPPY!

ok rage i can help you out now!!

 

[redslert]

i have a total of 12 function
right now....but this is going to change as i'm going to have to fix my style now!

i have

newGame
mkaeAlive
step
orderPlayers
checkAliveAll
accusation
informNoDisprover
suggestion
informDisprover
getNames
getDisprove
checkSuggestion


as i said this is going to change...right now my style is really bad!

that's the order which it is currently in my program....
try not to copy...hmmm not try.....DON'T copy

 

[redslert]

hmmm after typing up that list i think my variable names are so freekin bad

going to have to change them

 

[cyrax83]

*doomed*