condensation polymer (2 Viewers)

[mitsui]

thats where my second weakness comes in - i have the shittiest memory. hahaha!!

i tried to memorise, but neva work. -___-"
so all my notes r in the shortest dot pts possible. (keep the long passage away from me!!><! O_O!)

 

[Dreamerish*~]

lolz...I knew I should have asked for more paper...
For some reason I couldn't balance the esterification reaction so I was forced to write a word equation *so embarrassing

I hate when that happens! And then you'd panic because it's an exam.

I've done it before, wrong equations that I couldn't fix and equations where I just made up the products. I always crossed it out so much that the markers wouldn't be able to tell what I wrote and couldn't go "How stupid is this girl? Look what she wrote and crossed out!".

Mitsui: Sounds like dot-point answers would work for you. Some markers prefer them over sentenced answers. Remember that you're not obliged to spell everything correctly or write your answers with no grammatical errors (although structure is important).

 

[Riviet]

Riviet: Thank God, someone's writing is worse than mine... though "without oxygen" means exactly the same thing as "anaerobic", for future reference.

Is my writing that messy? I think tt looks much better when it's on A4 paper, instead of zoomed in on your screen. I hate how I can't write "on the lines" consistently, always seem to write a bit above or below the line.
I just wrote anaerobic with "without oxygen" so I remember a little better, there's so much we need to know!

 

[pLuvia]

Just to let you know one more, which might make you remember anaerobic better:

"with oxygen" is aerobic

@Mitsui: didn't you say it took like a long time to do one dot point lol and not even one page lol.

 

[pLuvia]

Don't worry Riviet, your writing isn't as bad as some people I know lol, there's is like unreadable

 

[mitsui]

LOL!!!
nah man riviet got a pretti good handwriting as compare to many others i have seen

yea pluvia, it takes me ages to do one dot pt. >_> like...ages

 

[Riviet]

"with oxygen" is aerobic

Cool, thanks for that, reminds me of some P.E knowledge that I once had long ago... hehe.

Thanks guys for reassuring me, I just got the impression that it wasn't that well aligned, but I'm all cool now.

 

[.ben]

hey guys do you mind posting ur own dot pot summaries? cos i just wanna see what u guys wrote. thz

 

[pLuvia]

I would if I had typed mine up lol, but you can ask me whatever dot point and I'd be happy to type it here for you

 

[mitsui]

hey guys do you mind posting ur own dot pot summaries? cos i just wanna see what u guys wrote. thz

yea i hand write mine too. >_>

i can always post it up after pluvia and riviet if u need it. HAHA

not sure about reliability :mad1:

 

[.ben]

ok cool, for the nuke chem one:

 Process information from secondary sources to describe recent discoveries of elements

how many elements do you have to do and how much info?

thanks

 

[insert-username]

ok cool, for the nuke chem one:

 Process information from secondary sources to describe recent discoveries of elements

how many elements do you have to do and how much info?

thanks

I'm pretty sure you only need 1 element. I did ununquadium, and I had the date created, where created, how created, its atomic/mass number and position in periodic table. Then I put other interesting random info ("ununquadium-298, though not yet synthesised, is predicted to be relatively stable for a transuranic element, possibly having a half life measurable in hours or days", etc).


Riviet: It's still plenty readable, and that's all that counts. My writing varies from subject to subject though - Chem is usually nice and neat, and Economics is a scrawl, nothing more.


I_F

 

[pLuvia]

ok cool, for the nuke chem one:

 Process information from secondary sources to describe recent discoveries of elements

how many elements do you have to do and how much info?

thanks

Hey come to think of it, I haven't done that dot point lol I'll get to it later

 

[Dreamerish*~]

ok cool, for the nuke chem one:

 Process information from secondary sources to describe recent discoveries of elements

how many elements do you have to do and how much info?

thanks

I think one would suffice. You are only using it as an example as the question asks you to "describe recent discoveries of elements". You would also write about how they are usually discovered (neutron bombardment, positron bombardment).

 

[pLuvia]

Is positron bombardment the high speed positive particles in the linear accelerator and the cyclotron? like the helium and carbon?

 

[Dreamerish*~]

Is positron bombardment the high speed positive particles in the linear accelerator and the cyclotron? like the helium and carbon?

Correct!

 

[pLuvia]

Correct!

Ok thanks for that

 

[.ben]

Do we hav to know about positron bmobrdment? How come its wasn’t in the excel or the pathways?

 

[pLuvia]

Well it was what I just said before about the linear accelerators and cyclotrons, instead of neutron bombardment the nucleus is bombarded with high speed positive particles such as helium and carbon. This should be under how transuranic elements are formed dot point

 

[mitsui]

hm i know the "bombarded with high speed positive particles "

but neva know it is called "positron bmobrdment"