MzbLaZeIT
im am teh seks.
oh i forgot to mention not worry about stds and other dirty virus's out there..!!mr_brightside said:
Condoms or No Condoms (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter celene123
- Start date
nwatts
Active Member
pill isn't 100% though, still causes worriesmr_brightside said:
Cykologi_gal
Psyche...
My first 3 times were without condoms, but he didn't come anyway and I've gotta say, before I'd thought it wouldn't matter, you know, that females won't notice the difference, but yes, we do as well, unfortunately...and I refuse to go on the pill.
T-mac01
Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2006
- Messages
- 400
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- N/A
I'm not sure when a girl says she has taken the pills. It just makes me wonder if she's trying to let me get her pregnant and have babies.bubz :D said:
Don't fall for that trap. And dispose your condoms thoroughly so she won't steal it and pour the semens into a container for future use.
maccaman
Banana's in your mama's.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2006
- Messages
- 63
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
I thought he was serious, until the second line :S
If I havn't posted on this yet, girls get shittier when they're on the pill... but bareback is alot better. I would only ever go out with a girl that I'm very sure is clean (ie virgin or we both get checked beforehand).
Even the nicest girls can become bitches on the pill, so I guess... I'm just doing the very irresponsible thing.
If I havn't posted on this yet, girls get shittier when they're on the pill... but bareback is alot better. I would only ever go out with a girl that I'm very sure is clean (ie virgin or we both get checked beforehand).
Even the nicest girls can become bitches on the pill, so I guess... I'm just doing the very irresponsible thing.
withoutaface
Premium Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2004
- Messages
- 15,098
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2004
Then get your partner tested...MzbLaZeIT said:
wheredanton
Retired
um...pre cum can and probably often does contain sperm.Cykologi_gal said:
if by 'can and probably often' you mean 'highly unlikely', then i agree.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-ejaculate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-ejaculate
Cykologi_gal
Psyche...
Nah, there was no pre-cum as well. We were far from heaven.
wheredanton
Retired
Cykologi_gal said:
nevermind.
maccaman
Banana's in your mama's.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2006
- Messages
- 63
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
I'm in the same boat as Cykologi_gal, as in far from heaven, but there's still a risk of pre-cum. I just take that risk.
What's riskier - precum, or pill + full ejaculation... hmm, does anyone know the stats for that?
What's riskier - precum, or pill + full ejaculation... hmm, does anyone know the stats for that?
wheredanton
Retired
if you keep having sex without a condom and keep using the withdrawal method it is only a matter of time before you get your gf pregnant.
Last edited:
dagwoman
Welcome to My Lair
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2006
- Messages
- 1,028
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
The pill is way more effective than the withdrawal "method".
From Wiki:
"Like many methods of birth control, reliable effectiveness is achieved only by correct and consistent use. Observed failure rates of withdrawal vary depending on the population being studied: studies have found actual failure rates of 15-28% per year.[2] In comparison the pill has an actual use failure rate of 8%, while the diaphragm has an actual use failure rate of 16%.[3] The condom has an actual use failure rate of 10-18%.[4]
For couples that use withdrawal correctly at every act of intercourse, the failure rate is 4% per year. In comparison the pill has a perfect-use failure rate of 0.3%, while the diaphragm has a perfect use failure rate of 6%.[3] The condom has a perfect-use failure rate of 2%.[3]
The primary cause of failure of the withdrawal method is the lack of self-control of those using it. Poor timing of the withdrawal can result in semen on the vulva, which can easily migrate into the female reproductive tract. Some medical professionals view withdrawal as an ineffective method of birth control.[5] In contrast, a recent study in Iran found that provinces with higher rates of withdrawal use do not have higher fertility rates, and that the contribution of withdrawal use to unintended pregnancies is not markedly different from that of other commonly used methods such as the pill or condom.[6]
It has been suggested that the pre-ejaculate ("Cowper's fluid"), fluid emitted by the penis prior to ejaculation, contains spermatozoa (sperm cells), and is easily drawn into the vagina by capillary action. However, several small studies[7][8] have failed to find any viable sperm in the fluid. While no large conclusive studies have been done, it is now believed the primary cause of method (correct-use) failure is the pre-ejaculate fluid picking up sperm from a previous ejaculation.[9] For this reason, it is recommended that users of withdrawal have the male partner urinate between ejaculations, to clear the urethra of sperm, and wash any ejaculate from objects that might come near the woman's vulva (e.g. hands and his penis).[10]"
From Wiki:
"Like many methods of birth control, reliable effectiveness is achieved only by correct and consistent use. Observed failure rates of withdrawal vary depending on the population being studied: studies have found actual failure rates of 15-28% per year.[2] In comparison the pill has an actual use failure rate of 8%, while the diaphragm has an actual use failure rate of 16%.[3] The condom has an actual use failure rate of 10-18%.[4]
For couples that use withdrawal correctly at every act of intercourse, the failure rate is 4% per year. In comparison the pill has a perfect-use failure rate of 0.3%, while the diaphragm has a perfect use failure rate of 6%.[3] The condom has a perfect-use failure rate of 2%.[3]
The primary cause of failure of the withdrawal method is the lack of self-control of those using it. Poor timing of the withdrawal can result in semen on the vulva, which can easily migrate into the female reproductive tract. Some medical professionals view withdrawal as an ineffective method of birth control.[5] In contrast, a recent study in Iran found that provinces with higher rates of withdrawal use do not have higher fertility rates, and that the contribution of withdrawal use to unintended pregnancies is not markedly different from that of other commonly used methods such as the pill or condom.[6]
It has been suggested that the pre-ejaculate ("Cowper's fluid"), fluid emitted by the penis prior to ejaculation, contains spermatozoa (sperm cells), and is easily drawn into the vagina by capillary action. However, several small studies[7][8] have failed to find any viable sperm in the fluid. While no large conclusive studies have been done, it is now believed the primary cause of method (correct-use) failure is the pre-ejaculate fluid picking up sperm from a previous ejaculation.[9] For this reason, it is recommended that users of withdrawal have the male partner urinate between ejaculations, to clear the urethra of sperm, and wash any ejaculate from objects that might come near the woman's vulva (e.g. hands and his penis).[10]"